Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
RAJBALA MITTAL V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...
Case Number: 3639
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2013
SUDERSHAN KAPOOR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate SUMAN KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...
Case Number: 3640
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2013
SHAKUMBARI DEVI V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate SUMAN KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...
Case Number: 3641
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2013
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SURESH SOOD
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1088
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2016
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S NARESH SOOD
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1090
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2016
Bathinda Development Authority V/S Angrej Kaur
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhagla
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/3211. Angrej Kaurd/o Jhakhar singh r/o village Jalalana district Sirsa, wife of Darshan singh r/o H.No.1293-C,Model town Phase I Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bathinda Development Authoritythrough its Administraror,Model town,Phase I, Opp.Guru...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANR. V/S BALBIR SINGH
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 351 OF 2013 IN RP/2940/20131. BALBIR SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTIC...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2013
VISHNUJI RAM V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3138 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 11/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1815/2012 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/5523/20131. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNAVEEN BHAWAN ,BIPINKHAND, GOMTI NAGAR, ...
Case Number: 3138
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2013
THE NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S SWARNIM VIHAR ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTS & 61 ANR.
Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRASANTHI PRASAD
Respondant Advocate NA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 18 OF 20051. SWARNIM VIHAR ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTS & 61 ANR.Through its President, Section-82, NoidaU.P............Complainant(s)Versus1. THE NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through The C...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2005
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2013
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HATAM SINGH
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND NANDAN
Respondant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 27/03/2006 in Appeal No. 3343/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. HATAM SINGHDHRAM PAL SINGH VILL- MORTA JALALABAD DISTRICT - GHAZIABAD U,P ...........P...
Case Number: 2200
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.