Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate SH.O.P SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3210 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 26/04/2013 in Appeal No. 613/2006 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH RA/129/2014,IA/5623/2013,IA/5909/20131. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYD BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR,VIKAS S...
Case Number: 3210
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 3056
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 6574
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2013 IN RP/3636/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SANJEEV NARAIN SAXENA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE, PRESIDING M...
Case Number: 367
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2013
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4174 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1092/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, Sector-6PANCHKULAHAR...
Case Number: 4174
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2013
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate SUMAN KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...
Case Number: 3634
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2013
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...
Case Number: 3635
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2013
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...
Case Number: 3636
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2013
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...
Case Number: 3637
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2013
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK YADAV
Respondant Advocate SUMAN KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3634 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1683/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/6457/20131. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, VIKAS PATH,...
Case Number: 3638
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.