Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2014 IN RP/3175/20131. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHAVNA & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER For the Ap...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS NAUTIYAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3873 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/09/2013 in Appeal No. 919/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/6887/2013,IA/6888/2013,IA/6889/2013,IA/7287/20131. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN,...
Case Number: 3873
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2014
Development Authority Education
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 475
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4026 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1992/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...
Case Number: 4026
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4044 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1994/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...
Case Number: 4044
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4045 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1995/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...
Case Number: 4045
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3323 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 14/05/2013 in Appeal No. 343/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. CAPT. SURINDER KUMAR SHARMAS/O SH. CHIRANJI LAL, G-23/255, SECTOR- 7, ROHINI, DELHI - 110085........
Case Number: 3323
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3711 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 28/05/2013 in Appeal No. 763/2007 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/6597/2013,IA/6598/20131. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN INA, NEW DELHI...........P...
Case Number: 3711
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3758 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 09/02/2005 in Appeal No. 1683/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MORADABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY- - -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. GURDEESH KUMAR DODA...
Case Number: 3758
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 08-01-2014
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAVI GOPAL, MR. DEEPAK PANDEY & MS. KANCHAN PANDEY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2501 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/05/2012 in Appeal No. 721/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. JAGDEEP NARANGNiwasi Prakost kamak 202 Sanjay Apts 74 Nex Vishnupuri ColonyIndore - 4520...
Case Number: 2501
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.