Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
ARCHANA VERMA & ANR. V/S GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RANJIT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 796 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 09/09/2013 in Appeal No. 831/2009 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/556/2014,IA/557/20141. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(GMADA FOR SHORT) & FORMEL...
Case Number: 796
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2014
ESTATE OFFICER, HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S N.K. MATHUR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION REVISION PETITION NO. 4 OF 2014(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission Haryana)1. N.K. MATHURH. NR. C-4-H/79, GF, JANAKPURINEW DELHI-110058...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ESTATE OFFICE...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2014
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HEMANT KKUMAR
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-10-2016
KANWAL ARORA V/S HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKARA RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. ANKUR JAITLY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 769 OF 2013 IN RP/2587/20121. HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KANWAL ARORA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. G...
Case Number: 769
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2014
Raju Nonia V/S Mineral Area Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Bhawesh Kumar, Ravi Kumar
Respondant Advocate Mr. Shobhakar Mishra
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2022
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHRI KRISHAN GUPTA
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.D. GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 694 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/09/2013 in Complaint No. 42/2008 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHRI KRISHAN GUPTA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s)...
Case Number: 694
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2014
ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANIZATION V/S AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KULSHRESTHA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.B. PRASAD
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 80 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/05/2007 in Complaint No. 91/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice chairman, Agra, Uttar Pradesh. ...........Appellant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2014
COMMISSIONER, BELGAUM, URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MOHAN PUNNAPPA MANNOLKAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. D.P. CHATURVEDI
Respondant Advocate MR. B. SUBRAHMANYA PRASAD
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 26 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 30/03/2009 in Appeal No. 790/2008 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. MOHAN PUNNAPPA MANNOLKARR/o. H. No. 848, Mahadhwa RoadBelgaum - 590002Karnataka...........Petit...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2014
S.P. BHATNAGAR (NOW DEAD) THROUGH LRS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1730 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 23/05/2006 in Appeal No. 9/2004 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/766/2014,IA/3993/20131. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR H-I, VIKAS SADAN I.N...
Case Number: 1730
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2014
AFFAQE HUSAIN RAZVI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG
Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2805 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 14/02/2008 in Appeal No. 819/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY6, Jagdish Chandra Bose Marg,LucknowUttar Pradesh..............
Case Number: 2805
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.