Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAJU FRANCIS
Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 36 OF 20041. SWARNIN VIHAR ASSOCATION OF RESIDENT HIG30-A, HIG, SECTOR-82,NOIDA............Complainant(s)Versus1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER., MAIN ADMINI...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2004
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2014
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.P. SHORAWALA
Respondant Advocate MR. C.S. GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/04/2012 in Appeal No. 361/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY-MeerutU.P...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. OM PRAKASH GUPTA &...
Case Number: 2530
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2014
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. S.A. SAUD & MR. M. P. DABAS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1343 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/12/2013 in Appeal No. 2834/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/1573/2014,IA/1574/20141. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRERTARY, 6 J...
Case Number: 1343
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2014
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. S.A. SAUD & MR. M. P. DABAS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1344 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 13/01/2012 in Appeal No. 136/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/1575/2014,IA/1576/2014,IA/1577/20141. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SEC...
Case Number: 1344
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MANOJ RANJAN SINHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4888 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/09/2013 in Appeal No. 86/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/8162/20131. RAM PAL SINGHS/O LATE SHRI HARI SINGH, R/O A-357A, NAND GRAM, GHAZIABAD...
Case Number: 4888
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY SINGH
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4288 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 09/06/2007 in Appeal No. 729/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, HUDA, GURGAON, HARYANA...........Petit...
Case Number: 4288
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2014
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Ld. Advocate
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/327/2012 1. ASIT HAZARI62, B/4, BOSE PUKUR ROAD, KOL.-42. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. INSURANCE REGULATORY & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERSPRASHRAM BHAVAN, 3RD. FLOOR, BASEERBAGH, HYDERABAD-500...
Case Number: 327
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate M/S. R.S.A. & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3667 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/08/2013 in Appeal No. 1588/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RADHA VERMAW/O LATE SRI RAJIV VERMA, 16-SRI ANANDPUR DHAM DHARAMPUR, VISHNUPUR, BALRAMPU...
Case Number: 3667
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 888 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/11/2012 in Appeal No. 459/2008 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/1608/20131. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFIC...
Case Number: 888
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-03-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 926 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 22/10/2013 in Appeal No. 1039/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/643/20141. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN INA NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 926
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-03-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.