company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SWARNIN VIHAR ASSOCATION OF RESIDENT HIG

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAJU FRANCIS

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 36 OF 20041. SWARNIN VIHAR ASSOCATION OF RESIDENT HIG30-A, HIG, SECTOR-82,NOIDA............Complainant(s)Versus1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER., MAIN ADMINI...

Case Number: 36

|

Date of Filing: 14-05-2004

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2014

NCDRC

OM PRAKASH GUPTA & ANR. V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M.P. SHORAWALA

Respondant Advocate MR. C.S. GUPTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/04/2012 in Appeal No. 361/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY-MeerutU.P...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. OM PRAKASH GUPTA &...

Case Number: 2530

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 21-04-2014

NCDRC

BANSI DHAR DUBEY V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. S.A. SAUD & MR. M. P. DABAS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1343 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/12/2013 in Appeal No. 2834/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/1573/2014,IA/1574/20141. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRERTARY, 6 J...

Case Number: 1343

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2014

NCDRC

GANESH SHANKER TRIPATHI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. S.A. SAUD & MR. M. P. DABAS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1344 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 13/01/2012 in Appeal No. 136/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/1575/2014,IA/1576/2014,IA/1577/20141. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SEC...

Case Number: 1344

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2014

NCDRC

GHAZIBAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAM PAL SINGH

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MANOJ RANJAN SINHA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4888 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/09/2013 in Appeal No. 86/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/8162/20131. RAM PAL SINGHS/O LATE SHRI HARI SINGH, R/O A-357A, NAND GRAM, GHAZIABAD...

Case Number: 4888

|

Date of Filing: 27-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2014

NCDRC

MS. NIDHI MALIK V/S HARYANA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY SINGH

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4288 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 09/06/2007 in Appeal No. 729/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, HUDA, GURGAON, HARYANA...........Petit...

Case Number: 4288

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2007

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2014

West Bengal

INSURANCE REGULATORY & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERS V/S ASIT HAZARI

Development Authority  

Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Ld. Advocate

cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/327/2012 1. ASIT HAZARI62, B/4, BOSE PUKUR ROAD, KOL.-42. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. INSURANCE REGULATORY & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERSPRASHRAM BHAVAN, 3RD. FLOOR, BASEERBAGH, HYDERABAD-500...

Case Number: 327

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

VICE CHAIRMAN GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RADHA VERMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate M/S. R.S.A. & CO.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3667 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/08/2013 in Appeal No. 1588/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RADHA VERMAW/O LATE SRI RAJIV VERMA, 16-SRI ANANDPUR DHAM DHARAMPUR, VISHNUPUR, BALRAMPU...

Case Number: 3667

|

Date of Filing: 15-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2014

NCDRC

KANWAL PREET SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 888 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/11/2012 in Appeal No. 459/2008 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/1608/20131. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFIC...

Case Number: 888

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-03-2014

NCDRC

USHA KIRAN V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 926 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 22/10/2013 in Appeal No. 1039/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/643/20141. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN INA NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Ver...

Case Number: 926

|

Date of Filing: 29-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 13-03-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.