Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2014 IN RP/325/20031. ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2014
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1577 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 04/01/2013 in Appeal No. 318/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, MOTIJHEEL KANPURU.P...........Peti...
Case Number: 1577
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2014
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 45
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. RBT/FA/13/2InLog No. 1549/111. Smt. Sujata R. Sulakhe 133, Ojas, Room No.1, Dr. M. B. Raut Road Shivaji Park, Mumbai - 400028Mumbai Maharashtra 2. Mr. R. D. Sulakhe 133, Ojas, Roo...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1733 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 26/09/2013 in Appeal No. 666/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, KARNALHARYANA...........Petition...
Case Number: 1733
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2014
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/86/2012( Date of Filing : 02 Feb 2012 )1. MR JOGINDER SINGH R/O S-122 VENUS APARTMENT SECTOR-9 ROHINI DELHI 110085...........Complainant(s...
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2018
Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 118 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/01/2007 in Appeal No. 2129/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMAIN ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, SECTOR 6, NOIDA, DIS...
Case Number: 1153
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2014
Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 118 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/01/2007 in Appeal No. 2129/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMAIN ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, SECTOR 6, NOIDA, DIS...
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHAKAR DWIVEDI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 126 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 3516/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARY...
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.