company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 78 OF 2014 IN RP/325/20031. ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...

Case Number: 78

|

Date of Filing: 31-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2014

NCDRC

PARAMESHWARDEEN MISHRA V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1577 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 04/01/2013 in Appeal No. 318/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, MOTIJHEEL KANPURU.P...........Peti...

Case Number: 1577

|

Date of Filing: 27-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 05-06-2014

Madhya Pradesh

GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S Smt.GEETA BHADORIYA

Development Authority  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAMDUTT TIWARI

Development Authority  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 45

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2016

Maharashtra

Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority V/S Smt. Sujata R. Sulakhe

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. RBT/FA/13/2InLog No. 1549/111. Smt. Sujata R. Sulakhe 133, Ojas, Room No.1, Dr. M. B. Raut Road Shivaji Park, Mumbai - 400028Mumbai Maharashtra 2. Mr. R. D. Sulakhe 133, Ojas, Roo...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 01-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

ANASHWAR CHOPRA & ANR. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1733 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 26/09/2013 in Appeal No. 666/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, KARNALHARYANA...........Petition...

Case Number: 1733

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2014

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MR JOGINDER SINGH

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/86/2012( Date of Filing : 02 Feb 2012 )1. MR JOGINDER SINGH R/O S-122 VENUS APARTMENT SECTOR-9 ROHINI DELHI 110085...........Complainant(s...

Case Number: 86

|

Date of Filing: 02-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-09-2018

NCDRC

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PRAKASH CHANDRA SHUKLA

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 118 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/01/2007 in Appeal No. 2129/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMAIN ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, SECTOR 6, NOIDA, DIS...

Case Number: 1153

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 22-04-2014

NCDRC

PRAKASH CHANDRA CHANDTA SHUKLA V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 118 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/01/2007 in Appeal No. 2129/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMAIN ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, SECTOR 6, NOIDA, DIS...

Case Number: 118

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 22-04-2014

NCDRC

ASHOK KUMAR & 2 ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHAKAR DWIVEDI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 126 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 3516/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARY...

Case Number: 126

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 05-05-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.