company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

JYOTI BHUSHAN V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RANBIR YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2857 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 22/03/2013 in Appeal No. 1556/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRERTARY, MERRUTU.P...........Petitioner(s)Ver...

Case Number: 2857

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2014

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HATAM SINGH

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND NANDAN

Respondant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2013 IN RP/2200/20061. HATAM SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHO...

Case Number: 818

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 09-06-2014

NCDRC

REA BARELI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S L.S. SHARMA

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA & MR. PAWAN KUMAR RAY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1494 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/12/2013 in Appeal No. 1865/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. L.S. SHARMAS/O LATE SHRI PRABHU DAYAL SHARMA, R/O L/237, INDIRA NAGAR (EXTN), RDA, RAE B...

Case Number: 1494

|

Date of Filing: 24-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2014

NCDRC

RAJENDER PRASAD AND ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate MR. NIRAJ SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1262-1314 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 19/12/2007 in Appeal No. 981/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RA...

Case Number: 1262

|

Date of Filing: 28-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 11-06-2014

NCDRC

HARSH VARDHAN V/S THE CHAIRMAN/COMMISSIONER, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS.

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. PARVEZ DABAS & MR. S.A. SAUD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2141 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 04/09/2013 in Appeal No. 517/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. THE CHAIRMAN/COMMISSIONER, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS.THROUGH SECRETARY, 6 JAG...

Case Number: 2141

|

Date of Filing: 07-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-05-2014

NCDRC

CHANCHAL KUMAR V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3095 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 14/05/2013 in Appeal No. 265/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYINA,VIKAS SADAN.NEW DELHI ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. CHANCHAL KU...

Case Number: 3095

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-06-2014

NCDRC

AMRIT BHATIA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY PAL, ADV.

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 235 OF 2014 IN RP/2491/20071. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...........Appellants(s)Versus1. AMRIT BHATIA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENTHON...

Case Number: 235

|

Date of Filing: 24-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 12-05-2014

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HOLTECH COOP G.H. SOCIETY LTD.

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. TRIPAT SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 459 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 19/02/2013 in Complaint No. 324/2002 of the State Commission Delhi)1. HOLTECH COOP G.H. SOCIETY LTD.Plot No.2,Sector-9, Dwarka, New Delhi-110 075...........Appellant(s)Ve...

Case Number: 459

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 07-05-2014

NCDRC

SUNJEET SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1882 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/11/2012 in Appeal No. 730/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ADDITIONAL CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR,2. THE E...

Case Number: 1882

|

Date of Filing: 06-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 05-05-2014

NCDRC

SUSHILA GUPTA V/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV YADAV

Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4554 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/11/2010 in Appeal No. 451/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Main Administrative Building, Sector - 6...

Case Number: 4554

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.