company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAM PYARI

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL

Respondant Advocate MOHD. MONIS ABBASI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 932 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 21/11/2007 in Appeal No. 1372/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RAM PYARIRESIDENT OF 417/82, NEW AZGANJ, KALYANPURI THAKURGANJ, LUCKNOW...........Petitio...

Case Number: 932

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 10-07-2014

Punjab

Bathinda Development Authority V/S Angrej Kaur

Development Authority  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABExecution Application No. EA/14/46InComplaint Case No. CC/13/3211. Angrej Kaurd/o Jhakhar singh r/o village Jalalana district Sirsa, wife of Darshan s...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 01-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DR. SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMA

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SIDHARTH BAWA

Respondant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KULSHRESHTHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2175 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/11/2011 in Appeal No. 2179/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. SURENDRA KUMAR SHARMAS/o Shri Maniram Sharma, R/o 22 Lajpat kunj , Near B.R CollegeA...

Case Number: 2175

|

Date of Filing: 01-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 07-07-2014

NCDRC

BABU LAL V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2214 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/03/2013 in Appeal No. 184/2010 & 2511/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, SECTOR- OFFICE SALES, ...

Case Number: 2214

|

Date of Filing: 15-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 04-07-2014

NCDRC

M/S. GODREJ & BOYCE MFG CO. LIMITED & ANR. V/S VIJAYAWADA-GUNTUR-TENALI-MANGALAGIRI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Godrej   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR

Respondant Advocate M/S. K .J. JOHN & CO.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2177 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 02/12/2013 in Appeal No. 974/2012 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. VIJAYAWADA-GUNTUR-TENALI-MANGALAGIRI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYREP BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN...

Case Number: 2177

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2014

NCDRC

KAUSHAL KISHOR & ANR. V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2603 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/01/2013 in Appeal No. 1837/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN,2. JOINT SECRETARY, ZONE-2 ...

Case Number: 2603

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 03-07-2014

NCDRC

PURNIMA MISHRA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. PARVEZ DABAS & MR. S.A. SAUD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2142 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 26/07/2011 in Appeal No. 773/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6 JAGDISH CHAND BOSE, MARG, LUCKNOWU....

Case Number: 2142

|

Date of Filing: 07-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 08-07-2014

NCDRC

R.K. BHILWARIA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2231 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 31/03/2014 in Appeal No. 1013/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/3332/20141. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s...

Case Number: 2231

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-06-2014

NCDRC

SHEELA AGGARWAL V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 937 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 03/09/2013 in Appeal No. 276/2010 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/684/20141. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INANEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 937

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-06-2014

NCDRC

MANJU GUPTA V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RANBIR YADAV

Respondant Advocate MR. GUTAM AWASTHI & MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2014 IN RP/2779/20121. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MANJU GUPTA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MRS....

Case Number: 118

|

Date of Filing: 22-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-06-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.