Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVDEEP SINGH & MR. M.S. KAPOOR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2521 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 10/03/2014 in Appeal No. 712/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. PRADEEP GAMBHIR & ANR.S/O SH.DHARAMBIR GAMBHIR, R/O W-115 GREATER KAILASH-IINEW DELHI 2. SH.SANDE...
Case Number: 2521
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2014
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2178 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/12/2011 in Appeal No. 13/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNaveen Bhawan, Bipin Khand, Gomti NagarLucknowU.P...........P...
Case Number: 2178
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2014
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. KRISHNA KANT SHUKLA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2432 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 24/04/2014 in Appeal No. 1641/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYKANPUR NAGAR, THROUGH SECRETARY, OFFICE AT MOTIJHEEL, KANPUR...
Case Number: 2432
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate M/S. DYNASTY LAW FIRM
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2440 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/03/2012 in Appeal No. 972/2007 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/4737/20131. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)Through its Estate Office...
Case Number: 2440
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S.S. MISHRA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2689 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 28/02/2013 in Appeal No. 326/2007 of the State Commission Orissa)1. VICE CHAIRMAN, BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.UNIT NO-III,AKASHA SOVA BUILDING, P.S KHA...
Case Number: 2689
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2014
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/2241. Sanjeev Gargson of Dean Chand Garg r/o 43, Type IV,Power colony, Lehra Mohabbat 151111 district Bathidna...........Comp...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2007
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2022
Development Authority Indore Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. MOHAN CHOUKSEY & MR. RITESH KHARE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1472 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/01/2013 in Appeal No. 2/2013 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY7 RACE COURSE ROAD,INDOREM.P...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. B...
Case Number: 1472
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate sh. A.K. Nagpal
Respondant Advocate Sh. R.R. Sharma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 321 of 2012 Date of instt.6.7.2012 Date of decision: 23.02.2015Prem Chand Saluja son of Shri J.R.Saluja resident of house no. 1531, Sector 13, Urban Estate, Karnal. ………..Complainant...
Case Number: 321
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2015
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2430 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 09/01/2014 in Appeal No. 1121/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYKANPUR NAGAR, THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARY,MOTIJHEEL,KANPUR N...
Case Number: 2430
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-07-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.