company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

V P DHALL & ANR. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AZHAR QAYUM BUTT

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3250 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 19/05/2014 in Appeal No. 431/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN INA,NEW DELHI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. V P DHALL & ...

Case Number: 3250

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2014

NCDRC

RAM SIYA GUPTA V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. R.N. SINGH & MR. M.K. SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3887 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 22/04/2013 in Appeal No. 2480/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN MOTIJHEELKANPURUTTAR PRADESH.........

Case Number: 3887

|

Date of Filing: 01-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2014

NCDRC

GEETA KUMARI V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3168 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/05/2014 in Appeal No. 630/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INANEW DELHIDELHI...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. GEETA K...

Case Number: 3168

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-09-2014

NCDRC

DEVKI NANDAN SHARMA V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RANBIR YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3175 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 12/02/2014 in Appeal No. 767/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARYMEERUTUTTAR PRADESH...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 3175

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2014

NCDRC

SANDEEP KHATRI V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 710 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 25/10/2013 in Appeal No. 569/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, (H-1) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VIKAS SADAN, I...

Case Number: 710

|

Date of Filing: 17-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2014

NCDRC

HARISHANKAR MAHAUR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHANTANU KRISHNA

Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 339 OF 2014 IN RP/3212/20121. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARISHANKAR MAHAUR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDI...

Case Number: 339

|

Date of Filing: 06-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2014

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S HATAM SINGH

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANAND NANDAN

Respondant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2200 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 27/03/2006 in Appeal No. 3343/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. HATAM SINGHDHRAM PAL SINGH VILL- MORTA JALALABAD DISTRICT - GHAZIABAD U,P ...........P...

Case Number: 2200

|

Date of Filing: 07-08-2006

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2014

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DR. VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 20/12/2013 in Complaint No. 263/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DR. VIJAY KUMAR GUPTAS/O. LATE KHEM CHAND GUPTA, R/O. HX-62, KITYANI, MANDSAUR, MADHTA PRADESH .........

Case Number: 68

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-08-2014

NCDRC

GURMEET SINGH MAKKAR V/S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. GEETA SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1774 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/08/2013 in Appeal No. 253/2014 & 1511/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.MOHALIPUNJAB2. ...

Case Number: 1774

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-08-2014

NCDRC

VIKAS DEEP PANDEY & ANR. V/S GORAKHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3144 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 09/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1031/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/5220/2014,IA/5221/2014,IA/5222/20141. GORAKHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ...

Case Number: 3144

|

Date of Filing: 05-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.