Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
VINOD KUMAR V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AZHAR QAYUM BUTT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3286 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 31/03/2014 in Appeal No. 332/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH VICE- CHAIRMAN VIKAS SADAN , INANEW DELHI- 110023...........Pe...
Case Number: 3286
|
Date of Filing: 25-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2014
KAMLESH RANI V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. HARVINDER KAUR CHAWDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. KIRAN KUMAR & MR. KARAN DEWAN & MS. AANCHAL JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1561 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 30/05/2013 in Appeal No. 1607/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)PUDA COMPLEX, OPP TEHSIL COMPLEX, JALANDHAR, THROUGH I...
Case Number: 1561
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2014
JASWINDER SINGH & ORS. V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate M/S. DYNASTY LAW FIRM
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2984 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 30/05/2011 in Appeal No. 1264/2006 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYPUDA bhawan, Jagraon Road, LudhianaPunjab............
Case Number: 2984
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2014
RAJENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA V/S RAE BARELI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN
Respondant Advocate MR. PAWAN KUMAR RAY
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 386 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/03/2011 in Appeal No. 728/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RAE BARELI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, JAIL GARDEN ROAD, RAE BARRELI U.P -...
Case Number: 386
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2014
Kanpur Development Authority V/S Pankaj Kumar Bansal
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: Kanpur Nagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 399
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2022
HARI KRISHNA JOHRI V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REENA SINGH
Respondant Advocate M/S. MANOJ SWARUP & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4706 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/05/2010 in Appeal No. 2392/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough-Vice Chairman...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HAR...
Case Number: 4706
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2014
DEVENDRA NATH MISHRA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3632 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 25/03/2011 in Appeal No. 267/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY. 6 JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU.P...
Case Number: 3632
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
SHARDA MISHRA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3633 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1743/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6, JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU...
Case Number: 3633
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
Pailan Park Development Authority Ltd. V/S Pradip Kumar Kar
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/14/567( Date of Filing : 28 Aug 2014 )1. Pradip Kumar KarThakurpukur Housing Estate, Flat No. 1A, 4/12, M.G. Road, Kolka...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2023
SHEO PRAKASH GUPTA & ANR. V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY
Respondant Advocate MR. V. P. SHARMA & MR. NIKHIL JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/10/2011 in Complaint No. 25/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVice Chairman, Motijheel Kanpur, KanpurU.P...........Appellant(s)V...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.