Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Gorakhpur Development Authority V/S Amrendra Kumar Tripathi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U K Srivastava
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2014/776(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Amrendra Kumar Tripathi a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Gorakhpur ...
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2015
YAMUNA EXPRESSWAY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S SANGEETA JAIN & 2 ORS.
Development Authority Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ISHAAN MADAAN
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 6241
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
HARISHANKAR MAHAUR V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHANTANU KRISHNA
Respondant Advocate MR. MANOJ RANJAN SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3212 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 31/05/2012 in Appeal No. 360/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice ChairmanGhazaiabadU.P...........Petitione...
Case Number: 3212
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2014
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sneh Kaushal W/o Naresh Kaushal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ashok Kapoor
Respondant Advocate Pawan Kajal, S.K. Kamboj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.198 of 2013 Date of instt:25.4.2013 Date of decision:14.09.2015Smt. Sneh Kaushal wife of Sh.Naresh Kaushal resident of house no.884/6, U.E.Karnal. ……….Complainant. VersusHaryana Urb...
Case Number: 198
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2015
Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali, Mangalgiri Urban Development Authority V/S Aluri Jhansi
Court Name: Krishna at Vijaywada
Appelant Advocate S.Subhas Chandra Bose
Respondant Advocate Somu Krishna Murthy
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2019
RANJIT AGGARWAL V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4552 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 07/08/2008 in Appeal No. 755/2008 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Addl. Chief Administrator, PUDA Urb...
Case Number: 4552
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2008
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2014
RAM JATAN V/S GREATER LUDHIANA AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate MR. M.S. SETHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2486 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/03/2013 in Appeal No. 1179/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)1. GREATER LUDHIANA AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYFEROZEPUR ROAD, LUDHIANA THROUGH ESTATE OFFICER,(GLA...
Case Number: 2486
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2014
MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3664 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 21/03/2014 in Appeal No. 2611/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTAS/O SH. HAZARI LAL R/O. MINCHHANABAD WALE PURANI TEHSIL ROADSIRSAHARYA...
Case Number: 3664
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2014
PREM KISHOR SINGH & ANR. V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3822 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 23/02/2012 in Appeal No. 2129/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU.P....
Case Number: 3822
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2014
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. V/S KARAMVEER SINGH & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2318 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 08/03/2010 in Appeal No. 890/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KARAMVEER SINGH & ANR.Both Residents of VPO ALalwalpur Tehsil Palwal, Distt. Faridabad, Through...
Case Number: 2318
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.