Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PANKAJ SACHAN
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. G.N. SACHAN(AUTHORIZED PERSON)
Respondant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3348 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/07/2013 in Appeal No. 96/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PANKAJ SACHANS/O SHRI G.N SANCHAN , THROUGH G.N SACHAN AUTHORIZED PERSON, R/O B-8/3, BALDA...
Case Number: 3348
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2014
DINESH KUMAR BANSAL V/S AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KULSHRESHTHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3636 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 27/03/2014 in Appeal No. 137/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, JAIPUR HOUSEAGRAUTTAR PRADESH..............
Case Number: 3636
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2014
ESTATE OFFICER, GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S MANDEEP KUMAR
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4160 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/03/2014 in Appeal No. 669/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. MANDEEP KUMAR...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ESTATE OFFICER, GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMEN...
Case Number: 4160
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2014
Ravindra Bhargav V/S Lucknow Development Authority
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Malesh Kumar Pandey
Respondant Advocate -
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/2224(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Lucknow Development Authority- BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Alok Kumar Bose...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS. V/S ROHIT LAHORI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. APARNA MATTOO & MS. RITIKA GAMBHIR
Respondant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKAR RAO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3603 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/05/2013 in Appeal No. 172/2012 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh) WITH IA/421/2014,IA/6408/20131. ROHIT LAHORIS/O DR.U.C LASHORI, R/O TYPE-B, BLOCKNO-5, ...
Case Number: 3603
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2014
HIMACHAL PRADESH HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS. V/S SANJAY LAHORI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. APARNA MATTOO & MS. RITIKA GAMBHIR
Respondant Advocate MR. Y. PRABHAKAR RAO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3603 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/05/2013 in Appeal No. 172/2012 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh) WITH IA/421/2014,IA/6408/20131. ROHIT LAHORIS/O DR.U.C LASHORI, R/O TYPE-B, BLOCKNO-5, ...
Case Number: 3604
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2014
VIDYA CHETAL V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 889 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/11/2012 in Appeal No. 751/2008 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, (NOEW GREATER L...
Case Number: 889
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2014
GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MANOJ KUMAR
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 305
|
Date of Filing: 26-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
KAMLESH RANI V/S PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate HARVINDER KAUR CHAWDHARY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 482 OF 2014 IN RP/1561/20141. PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA)...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KAMLESH RANI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRE...
Case Number: 482
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2014
M/S. GODREJ & BOYCE MFG CO. LIMITED & ANR. V/S VIJAYAWADA-GUNTUR-TENALI-MANGALAGIRI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 484 OF 2014 IN RP/2177/20141. VIJAYAWADA-GUNTUR-TENALI-MANGALAGIRI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. GODREJ & BOYCE MFG CO. LIMITED & ANR............Respondent(s...
Case Number: 484
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.