company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

GURTEJ SINGH V/S BATHINDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate MR. RAM DAYAL SHAHALIA & MR. MANU LUV SHAHALIA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4563 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1034/2007 of the State Commission Punjab)1. BATHINDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Estate Officer, Bhagu Road,BATHINDAPUNJAB...........Petit...

Case Number: 4563

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2014

NCDRC

GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DR. S.R. GURUMUKHI

Development Authority   Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY KUMAR BHARTI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4115 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 13/06/2014 in Appeal No. 2244/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. S.R. GURUMUKHIGATE NO-11, PLOT NO-4/5 BEHIND RAHUL ESTATE, 'B' CABIN ROAD, AMBERNATH...

Case Number: 4115

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 11-12-2014

NCDRC

AMAR SINGH TIWARI V/S AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KULSHRESHTHA

Respondant Advocate DR. SUMANT BHARADWAJ & MS. ARCHANA P. DAVE

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3797 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/09/2013 in Appeal No. 3288/2002 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, JAIPUR HOUSE,AGRAU.P...........Petition...

Case Number: 3797

|

Date of Filing: 24-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-12-2014

NCDRC

VANITA GUPTA V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JISHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 457 OF 2014 IN RP/2199/20101. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. VANITA GUPTA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRES...

Case Number: 457

|

Date of Filing: 15-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2014

NCDRC

MANOJ SHARMA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

Respondant Advocate R.R ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2428 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 21/01/2014 in Appeal No. 74/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6 JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU.P....

Case Number: 2428

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2014

NCDRC

URMILA TRIVEDI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 494 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/02/2013 in Complaint No. 119/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6, JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU.P.....

Case Number: 494

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 28-11-2014

NCDRC

SHAIL BALA GUPTA V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2650 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 05/05/2014 in Appeal No. 133/2014 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.JLN MARG, THROUGH COMMISSIONERJAIPURRAJASTHAN2. JAIPUR DEV...

Case Number: 2650

|

Date of Filing: 30-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2014

NCDRC

SUNIL KUMAR TYAGI V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. SUSHMA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4742 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 09/07/2013 in Appeal No. 287/2010 & 191/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MEERUTU.P...........Petitio...

Case Number: 4742

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 26-11-2014

NCDRC

RAJNI TYAGI V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. SUSHMA SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4743 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 09/07/2013 in Appeal No. 288/2010 & 192/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MEERUTU.P...........Petitio...

Case Number: 4743

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 26-11-2014

NCDRC

RAJNEESH SOOD V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOW GMADA)

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1282 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 13/02/2009 in Appeal No. 218/2002 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NOW GMADA)The Estate Officer. Punjab Urban Pl...

Case Number: 1282

|

Date of Filing: 13-04-2009

|

Date of Upload: 25-11-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.