Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate YASHPAL KHILAIRI
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/931/20141. ASHOK DHAYALJODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES SATYA DEO TAK PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SURENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. ZUBEDA QUADRI MEMBER For t...
Case Number: 931
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2015
Development Authority Ghaziabad Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SANKHLA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate REENA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 42 OF 20071. KALINDI BRIGHT STEELS & TUBES LTD.D 9/3, OKHLA INDUSTRIES AREA PHASE-2,NEW DELHI - 110 020...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR.THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, V...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2014
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV DHAMA & MR. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. YATENDTRA SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4111 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/08/2012 in Appeal No. 1771/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH SECRETARY, MEERUTU.P............Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 4111
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate R.D. Sharma
Respondant Advocate Jaideep Kaushik
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SONEPAT. Complaint No.183 of 2014 Instituted on:28.7.2014 Date of order:16.04.2015Subhash Thakkar son of Hari Kishan Thakkar, resident of H.No.787, Sector 14, Sonepat. ...Complainant. VersusHUDA Sector 15, Sonepat through ...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2015
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1212 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 20/01/2010 in Appeal No. 92/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary, 6, Jagdish Chand Bose MargLucknow(Utta...
Case Number: 1212
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2014
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. REENA SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. YASHWARDHAN TIWARI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4874 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 03/11/2008 in Appeal No. 3038/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Vice ChairmanKanpurUttar Pradesh...........Petit...
Case Number: 4874
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2014
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Raj
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 2004
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2004
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2015
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority Education Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASUTOSH LOHIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2152 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 27/01/2014 in Appeal No. 704/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. BHAGWAN EDUCATION SOCIETYPLOT NO-5, AG BLOCK, SHALIMAR BAGH, THROUGH ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, SMT. ...
Case Number: 2152
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4551 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/01/2012 in Appeal No. 1450/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS.Through its Chief Adminstrator,HARYANA2. Adminstra...
Case Number: 4551
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Supriya Dubey
Respondant Advocate Mr. Barun Prasad
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Miscellaneous Application No. MA/680/2014InFirst Appeal No. FA/551/20141. Insurance Regulatory and Development AuthorityParisrama Bhavanam, 5-9-58/B, 3rd Floor, Basheer Bagh, Hyderaba...
Case Number: 680
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.