Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MOHAN LAL KARWA
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate B L TIWARI
Respondant Advocate VIKAS PHOPHALIYA
Case Number: 627
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2015
Smt Sudarshana Devi V/S Kanpur Development Authority
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Pratul Srivastava
Respondant Advocate N. C. Upadhay
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2010/179(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Kanpur Development Authoritya...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Smt Su...
Case Number: 2010
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Lucknow Development Authority V/S Kuwar Bahdur Srivastava
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Yashpal Singh
Respondant Advocate -
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. R/110/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Kuwar Bahdur Srivastavaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Luckno...
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2015
The Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S A.Mahadevan S/o. Late Alagaraj
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate Sri.DSS
Respondant Advocate Sri.V.S.
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BHANVARLAL
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate HARENDRA SINGH INDA
Respondant Advocate N D NIMBAVAT
Case Number: 398
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SATYNARAYAN
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 787
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S LAXMINARAIN
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate O P KALLA
Respondant Advocate ANIL BHANDARI
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/227/20141. LAXMINARAIN JODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES SATYA DEO TAK PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. ZUBEDA QUADRI MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDER...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAMDYAL SANKHALA
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate R.P.PRAJAPAT
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/710/20141. RAMDYAL SANKHALAJODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES SATYA DEO TAK PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SURENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. ZUBEDA QUADRI MEMBER F...
Case Number: 710
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAMDYAL SANKHALA
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate RAMPRAKASH PRAJAPAT
Respondant Advocate VIKAS PHOPHALIYA
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/98/20141. RAMDYAL SANKHALAJODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:JUDGES SATYA DEO TAK PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SURENDRA SINGH CHOUHAN MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. ZUBEDA QUADRI MEMBER Fo...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT ASHA
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate S.S.GEHLOT
Respondant Advocate ANIL BHANDARI
Case Number: 380
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.