Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
P C Katiyar V/S Kanpur Development Authority
Development Authority Kanpur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1999/2744( Date of Filing : 07 Oct 1999 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Kanpur Development Authority Kanpur...........Appe...
Case Number: 1999
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-1999
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2022
Rajeshwar Singh V/S Agra Development Authority
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R K Gupta
Respondant Advocate Dr. Uday Veer Singh
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2011/2021(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Agra Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Rajesh...
Case Number: 2011
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2015
Shambhudayal Agarwal s/o Chiranjilal Agarwal V/S Jaipur Development Authority through Secretary
Development Authority Jaipur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parteek Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 403
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2015
Smt Rajesh Devi V/S Meerut Development Authority
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Raj
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/458(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Meerut Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Smt Rajesh Devia........
Case Number: 2008
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2015
Pailan Park Development Authority Ltd. V/S SRI AMIT MANNA
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT RANJEETA PATHAK
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate B.D.DADHICH
Respondant Advocate VIKAS PHOPHALIYA
Case Number: 915
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2015
Mohan Lal Yadav s/o Late. Narasingh Narayan V/S Jaipur Development Authority Through Sceretary
Development Authority Jaipur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Prateek Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 974
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2015
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BALBIR S/O NAND LAL
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate ANKUR TYAGI
Respondant Advocate SATWAN MANN
Balbir s/o Sh. Nand Lal V/s Haryana urban Developerment Authority Case no. EA/115/2013Present: Shri Ankur Tyagi Adv. For complainant -DHOrder On 31.03.2015 Ld. Counsel for the complainant –DH has made a statement that he does not want to continue with the present execution ...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2015
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S JAI PAL RATHEE S/O SUNEHRA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate DEEPAK
Respondant Advocate SATWAN MANN
Jai Pal Rathee V/s Haryana urban Developerment Authority Case no. EA/138/2013Present: Shri karamvir Singh for the complainant-DH jaipal Rathee.Order Shri Karamvir Singh has made a statement on 31.03.2015 that he has received the cheque no. 515423 dated dated 30.03.2015 worth Rs. ...
Case Number: 138
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DR YOGESH KUMAR BHATI
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate S R CHOUDHARY
Respondant Advocate V LAXMI JOSHI
Case Number: 333
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.