Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Dinesh Kumar Sharma
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Manoj Tehri
Respondant Advocate
Learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement that due to some technical reasons he do not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraw the same with the liberty to file a fresh on the samecauseof action. keeping in view on the statement of learned counsel fo...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2015
Jalandhar Development Authority V/S Bishan Singh
Development Authority Jalandhar Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 316
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2015
Sri Jagadish Rai Puri V/S Secretary, Bhubaneswar Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. D. Mohapatra & Assoc.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2017
Mandya Urban Development Authority V/S Sri.Sunil Kumar
Court Name: Mandya
Appelant Advocate Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma
Respondant Advocate Sri.H.Basavaiah
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2015
Pailan Park Development Authority Ltd. and 3 others V/S Ardhendu Kapuria
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site : confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/234/20151. Ardhendu KapuriaRadha Bazar, Ampulia Para, Poramatala Road, Nabadwip, Nadia, P.S. - Nabadwip, Pin - 741302. .............
Case Number: 234
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-05-2015
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . V/S RAVINDER KUMAR THUKRAL.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate ABHINEET TANEJA.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Execution Application No:11 of 2015Date of Institution:10.03.2015Date of Decision:19.05.2015Ravinder Kumar Thukral s/o Sh.Ramgopal Thukral, R/o House No.526/19, Arya Nagar, Hansi, Distt. Hisar.….ComplainantVe...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2015
Pb.Urban Development Authority V/S Ravinder mohan
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/13/5581. Ravinder mohanDhab KhatikanAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Pb.Urban Development AuthorityGreen AvenueAmritsarPunjab............O...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2015
Vrinda Singh V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N C Upadhayay
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. R/2007/91(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Gorakhpur Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Vrinda Singha.........
Case Number: 2007
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2015
Tripta Devi & another V/S Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashish Grover
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 858
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2015
Subhash Singhal V/S Meerut Development Authority
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ram Raj
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/126(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development Authority Meerut...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Subhash Si...
Case Number: 2003
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2003
|
Date of Upload: 12-10-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.