Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
The Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S S.Ashoka,
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate Sri.S.Umesh
Respondant Advocate VKM
Nature of complaint:Deficiency in serviceDate of filing of complaint:11.04.2014Date of Issue notice:19.04.2014Date of order:15.07.2015Duration of Proceeding:1 year 3 months 4 days Sri Devakumar.M.C.MemberThe complaint filed by the complainant under section 12 of the C.P.Act 1986,...
Case Number: 659
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2015
Munavvar Husain V/S Agra Development Authority
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R K Gupta
Respondant Advocate U K Srivastava
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/484(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Agra Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Munavva...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2016
Savatri Agarwal w/o Matadeen Garg V/S Jaipur Development Authority through Secretary
Development Authority Jaipur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Prateek Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 461
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2015
Jaipur Development Authority through Secretary V/S Savatri Agarwal w/o Matadeen Garg
Development Authority Jaipur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M.D.Garg
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 879
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2015
Jaipur Development Authority through Secretary V/S Sunil Kumar Garg s/o Matadeen Garg
Development Authority Jaipur Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M.D.Garg
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 880
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2015
Prakash Chandra Agarwal V/S Meerut Development Authority
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Shrma
Respondant Advocate Vikas Kumar Agrawal
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1999/3137(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District Meerut)1. Meerut Development Authoritya...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Prakash Chandra...
Case Number: 1999
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-1999
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2015
Greater Ludhiana Area Development Authority V/S Surinder Kumar
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Surinder Kumar Vs GLADA (EA/136/19/05/2015)30.6.15Present: Sh.Ajay Chawla, proxy counsel for applicant. Sh.Rajinder Kumar Section Officer of GLADA/respondent. Ms.Babita, Ld. Member has not come present today. Sh.Rajinder Kumar Section Officer of GLADA/respondent has filed an...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2015
Pb Urban planning and Development Authority V/S Balwinder Singh
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Shanky Jindal
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/15/1981. Balwinder Singhson of Bara singh r/o vilage Chuhanke khurd thsil and district Barnala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-06-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S JAIKISHAN
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate MAHENDRA PARIK
Respondant Advocate VIJAY LAXMI JOSHI
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAMESH KUMAR
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate J GEHLOT
Respondant Advocate VIKAS FOFLIYA
Case Number: 886
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.