company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Gorakhpur Development Authority V/S Nikhil Srivastava

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate U K Srivastava

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2014/792(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Nikhil Srivastava a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Gorakhpur Develo...

Case Number: 2014

|

Date of Filing: 17-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 12-10-2015

Uttar Pradesh

Nayab Subedar Sohanveer Singh V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/466(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Meerut Development Authority A...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Nayab Subedar Sohanve...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 27-02-2004

|

Date of Upload: 28-01-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Gauri Shankar Chauhan V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate N C Upadhayay

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. R/2007/92(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Gorakhpur Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Gauri Shankar Chauh...

Case Number: 2007

|

Date of Filing: 04-05-2007

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2015

Punjab

Sanjiv Kumar Garg V/S Bathinda Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Balwinder Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1262

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-01-2016

Punjab

Gursimran Singh V/S Bathinda Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Balwinder Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1264

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-01-2016

Punjab

Gurdas Singh V/S Bathinda Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Balwinder Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 483

|

Date of Filing: 24-04-2014

|

Date of Upload: 12-10-2015

Karnataka

Bangalore Development Authority V/S Ramesh J

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 18-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2015

Punjab

Bathinda Development Authority V/S Davinder Kumar

Development Authority  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/4351. Davinder Kumarson f Sh.Ranjit singh r/o village Tatka PO Bodla tehsil Thanesar district Krukshetra...........Complainan...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 18-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-08-2015

Uttar Pradesh

Meerut Development Authority V/S Sanjay Gupta

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vikas Agarwal

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/2239(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Sanjay Gupta a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Meerut Development A...

Case Number: 2013

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-08-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.