Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Respondant Advocate Arun tandan
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2002/1146(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Agra Development AuthorityAgra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Dr. ...
Case Number: 2002
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2002
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2015
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/285/20081. ROSHAN LALRO H NO 816 FIRST FLOOR GURU RAM DAS NAGAR EXTN LAXMI NAGAR DELHI 110092...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVEL...
Case Number: 285
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2015
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM II AGRACOLLECTORATE CAMPUS AGRAComplaint Case No. CC51/20131. RANIRADHA 16/25 SADAR BHATI AGRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS SECRETARY / VICE PRESIDENTJAIPUR HOUSE AGRA............Opp.Party(s) BE...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2016
Sony Development Authority Sony India
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate BINU MATHEW
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/12/346( Date of Filing : 11 Jun 2012 )1. THE MARINE PRODUCTS EXPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYMPEDA HOUSE, PANAMPILLY AVENUE, POST BOX NO. 4272, KOCHI-682 036 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY...........Complainant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2018
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Malik
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2015
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Society
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULARevision Petition No.01 of 2015Date ofInstitution :07.01.2015Date of Decision:19.08.20151. Haryana Urban Development Authority, through its Chief Administrator, Head Office, Sector 6, Panchkula.2. Estate Officer, Ha...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2015
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate ASHISH MATHUR
Respondant Advocate V.L.JOSHI
Case Number: 373
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2015
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.S.Bhatia
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 726
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2015
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/36/2009( Date of Filing : 15 Jan 2009 )1. BACHHI DEVIRO NO 483 INCOME TAX COLONY NEW DELHI 110088...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI D...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2019
Development Authority Okhla Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Sharma
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/146/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/09/2014 in Case No. C/53/2013 of District Gautam Buddha Nagar)1. Himanshu Bansal And Sudhanshu BansalN...
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.