company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Vishwanath Sharma V/S Agra Development Authority

Development Authority   Agra Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate R. K. Gupta

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2002/388(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Agra Development AuthorityAgra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Vishw...

Case Number: 2002

|

Date of Filing: 19-02-2002

|

Date of Upload: 11-03-2016

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAVINDER SINGH

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/1747/20041. RAVINDER SINGHR/O A-76 FATECH NAGAR NEW DELHI 110018...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS V...

Case Number: 1747

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2004

|

Date of Upload: 20-11-2015

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S GAGAT SINGH

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/528/20091. GAGAT SINGHHOUSE NO 93 PHASE -II PREM NAGAR NAZAFGARH NEW DELHI 110043...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHO...

Case Number: 528

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 03-11-2015

Haryana

Rajesh Kumar V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULARevision Petition No.84 of 2015Date ofInstitution : 09.10.2015Date of Decision:14.10.20151. Haryana Urban Development Authority through its Chief Administrator, Sector 6, Panchkula.2. Estate Officer, Haryana Urban De...

Case Number: 84

|

Date of Filing: 09-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-10-2015

West Bengal

Pailan Park Development Authority Ltd. V/S Jayanta Banerjee

Development Authority  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site : confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/14/6771. Jayanta Banerjee14/F, Nomu Goswami Lane, Kolkata-700005............Complainant(s)Versus1. Pailan Park Development Author...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 16-10-2015

Haryana

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY . V/S SANGEETA.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:34 of 2015Date of Institution:26.05.2015Date of Decision:05.10.20151. Sangeeta w/o Sh.Raj Kumar Jindal2. Raj Kumar Jindal s/o Late Sh.Amarnath Both R/o House No.316, Sector-2, Panchkula. ...

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 26-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2015

West Bengal

The Deputy Secretary, Marketing & Management Unit , Kol. Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) V/S Sri Suvojit Pakrashi

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Joydeep Mukherjee

Respondant Advocate Mr. Barun Prasad

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Miscellaneous Application No. MA/570/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/218/20141. Sri Suvojit Pakrashikolkata...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The Deputy Secretary, Marketing & Management Uni...

Case Number: 570

|

Date of Filing: 09-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 28-09-2015

Uttar Pradesh

Satish Kumar V/S Kanpur Development Authority

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. N. C. Upadhayay

Respondant Advocate R.D. Kranti

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/2734(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Kanpur Development Authoritya...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Satis...

Case Number: 2003

|

Date of Filing: 09-10-2003

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2015

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MANOJ KUMAR VERMA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/398/20101. MANOJ KUMAR VERMA RO E-305 EAST OF KAILSASH NEW DELHI 110065...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUG...

Case Number: 398

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2015

West Bengal

Pailan Park Development Authority Ltd. V/S RIMA CHATTERJEE

Development Authority  

Court Name: Howrah

Appelant Advocate Manojit Banerjee,

Respondant Advocate Abhishek Sengupta

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892Complaint Case No. CC/14/5101. RIMA CHATTERJEEWife of Sri Tapan Chatterjee, 21/5, Kaipukur Lane, P.O. and P.S. Shibpur Dist How...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 17-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2015

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.