Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Bathinda Development Authority V/S Ashok Kumar
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate S.K.Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/15/351. Ashok Kumarson of Balwant Rai r/o .No.252, Kamla nehry colony, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bathinda Develo...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2016
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHYAM SUNDER SEN
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate RAKESH CHAND SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MAHAVEER MEHTA
Case Number: 328
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2016
VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S K.VENKATAPATHI RAJU
Court Name: Visakhapatnam
Appelant Advocate B.PRABHAKAR RAO
Respondant Advocate M.A.RASOOL
Case Number: 267
|
Date of Filing: 26-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2016
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S B K ARORA
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/19/20081. B K ARORA BOTH R/O FLAT NO. AN 32-B , SHALIMR BAGH DELHI 110088...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHRO...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2015
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S D D GEARS PVT LTD
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/477/20101. D D GEARS PVT LTD BLOCK A , G.T. KARNAL RAOD , DELHI 110033 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUG...
Case Number: 477
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2015
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PACHULAL SOLANKI
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate D. K. SINGH
Respondant Advocate MAHAVEER MEHTA
Case Number: 371
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2015
Pradeep Ahuja V/S New Okhala Industrial Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajneesh Kumar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2003/477(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. New Okhala Industrial Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Pradee...
Case Number: 2003
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2003
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2016
JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RENU JANGID
Development Authority Jodhpur Development Authority
Court Name: Jodhpur
Appelant Advocate KISHORE CHOUHAN
Respondant Advocate VIJAY LAXMI JOSHI
Case Number: 403
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2015
Pailan Park Development Authority Ltd. V/S SRI AMIT MANNA
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate Manojit Bandyopadhyay and Anindya Bhadra
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892Execution Application No. EA/15/58InComplaint Case No. CC/14/4601. SRI AMIT MANNASon of late Manas Kumar Manna, 15, Nilkamal Ku...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2015
Greater Mohali Development Authority V/S Sanjay Bhatia
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/130/20151. Sanjay BhatiaS/o Sh. G.D. Bhatia, R/o 2066/2, Sector 47-C, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Greater Mohali Development Authoritythrough its Chief Administrator, Mohali.2. The Estate OfficerGreater Mohali Development Aut...
Case Number: 130
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.