Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
Bathinda Development Authority V/S Govind Ram
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manish Bansal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2016
Bathinda Development Authority V/S Govind Ram
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Manish Bansal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2016
The Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) V/S Sri.C.Devaraju S/o.Late Cheluvegowda,
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate Sri.P.S.Nagendra
Respondant Advocate V.Sudarshan
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/174/20151. Sri.C.Devaraju S/o.Late Cheluvegowda,R/at No.1222/A, Devaraj Ara...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2016
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Ram Lal S/o Sewa Ram
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Akush Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh. D.S. Mann
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.362 of 2013 Date of instt.: 21.8.2013 Date of decision: 10.02.2016Ram Lal son of Shri Sewa Ram resident of house no.1925, Sector 13, Urban Estate, Karnal.. ……..Complainant. Vs.Haryana Urban...
Case Number: 362
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
The Chief Executive Officer Haldia Development Authority V/S Sri Debabrata Mahapatra
Court Name: Purba Midnapur
Appelant Advocate Santanu Chatterjee
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPURBA MEDINIPURABASBARI, P.O. TAMLUK, DIST. PURBA MEDINIPUR,PIN. 721636TELEFAX. 03228270317Complaint Case No. CC/87/20151. Sri Debabrata MahapatraS/O. Late Sudhangshu Shekhar Mahapatra, At Qtr. No. B- 14, Sector - 8, HFC Colony, P.O. - Ha...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2016
The Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S K.Chandrashekarappa S/o. K.J.Ujjanappa
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate Sri.B.H.Ganesh
Respondant Advocate N.T.Srinivasa
Case Number: 1450
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2016
Sukhpal Sharma V/S Bathinda Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Balwinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1556
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2016
Dr Ranjana Goyal V/S Agra Development Authority
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 04-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2016
The Commissioner Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) V/S V.Ramasamy, S/o.Late Vaithialingam,
Development Authority Mysore Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate Sri.V.R.Raghunathan
Respondant Advocate Sri.N.T.Srinivasa
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/113/20151. V.Ramasamy, S/o.Late Vaithialingam,No.156, Rasi Illam, Vijayanag...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2016
Haryana Urban Development Authority & Others V/S Lal Chand Sharma
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.