company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Karnataka

Shimoga Urban Development Authority V/S Karnataka Nair Service Society

Development Authority   Society  

Court Name: Shimoga

Appelant Advocate A.Gopikrishna

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 738

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-11-2020

Madhya Pradesh

CEO-GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT. SHARDA RANI

Development Authority  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate AJAY NIRANKARI

Respondant Advocate SATYENDRA DIXIT

Case Number: 396

|

Date of Filing: 22-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Kanpur Development Authority V/S Virendra Singh

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: Kanpur Dehat

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 41

|

Date of Filing: 08-08-2003

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Gorakhpur Development Authority V/S Smt Madhu Bala Srivastav

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M H Khan

Respondant Advocate Shailesh Kumar Srivastav

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2002/614(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Smt Madhu Bala Srivastav a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Gorakhpur Development Aut...

Case Number: 2002

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2002

|

Date of Upload: 05-05-2016

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Ms. Madhulika

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Kurukshetra

Appelant Advocate Sh. S.K. Goyal, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 559

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2016

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Geetha Seshadri

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate Sri. P.C. Ponnappa

Respondant Advocate Sri.Sudarshan.V.

Case Number: 215

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

GWALIOR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S VINOD KUMAR BAHAL

Development Authority  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate RAJESH MITTAL

Respondant Advocate AJEET SUDELE

Case Number: 144

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Ruksana Parveen V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate N C Upadhayay

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/2395(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Gorakhpur Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ruksana Parveena....

Case Number: 2008

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2016

Karnataka

Commissioner, Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Sureshkumar

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate Sri.V.S

Case Number: 473

|

Date of Filing: 01-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2016

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Sri.V.Ramakrishna, S/o. V.Velaiah Naidu,

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate Sri.K.N.Jayarama

Respondant Advocate Sri.K.Shankara

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/76/20151. Sri.V.Ramakrishna, S/o. V.Velaiah Naidu,No.125/3, A, Near Ganapat...

Case Number: 76

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.