company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

NCDRC

JOGINDER SINGH V/S KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. PANKAJ BHATIA, MR. ASHISH CHOUDHURY, MR. NIPUN GOEL & MR. DHRUV SURANA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2002 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 23/02/2018 in Appeal No. 530/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN, MOTI JHEEL, KANPUR NAGARUTTAR PRAD...

Case Number: 2002

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 21-03-2024

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Mohd.Halim

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate Harendra Singh Chauhan

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 561

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2001

|

Date of Upload: 21-03-2024

Punjab

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority V/S Sanjeev Kumar

Development Authority  

Court Name: Mansa

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Sh. Amit Singla

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMANSAPUNJABMiscellaneous Application No. MA/24/1( Date of Filing : 08 Jan 2024 )InComplaint Case No. CC/23/1501. Sanjeev KumarS/o Ramdiya S/o Natti Ram R/o Near Aggarwal Colony Bareta BudhladaMansaPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 24

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2024

|

Date of Upload: 20-03-2024

NCDRC

DR. SATINDER PAL SINGH V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) &3 ORS.

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUSHA NAGARAJAN

Respondant Advocate MR. PANKAJ GUPTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 06/11/2019 in Complaint No. 286/2019 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (PUDA) &3 ORS.THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, SECTOR 62, S...

Case Number: 55

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2021

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2024

NCDRC

SUSHIL AHUJA, THROUGH DEEPAK SHARMA (GPA HOLDER) V/S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Okhla Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHAY KUMAR TAYAL

Respondant Advocate MR. UCHIT BHANDARI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 964 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 28/04/2022 in Appeal No. 1455/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 964

|

Date of Filing: 28-07-2022

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2024

NCDRC

RIDDHI TANDON V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MUKESH VERMA PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 155 OF 2024 IN RP/1897/20231. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY6 JAGDISH CHANDRA BOSE MARG LUCKNOWLUCKNOWUTTAR PRADESH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RIDDHI TANDONA 757 INDIRA MARGLUCKNOWLUCKNOWU...

Case Number: 155

|

Date of Filing: 29-02-2024

|

Date of Upload: 26-03-2024

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH. SAURABH AGGARWAL

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1447

|

Date of Filing: 03-07-2023

|

Date of Upload: 13-03-2024

Circuit Bench Nagpur

MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ANOOP S.O. MOHANSINGH PARIHAR

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate GAYATRI THAKUR

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2020

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2024

NCDRC

SUHANI GARG V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. LOKESH SINHAL

Respondant Advocate MR. AMARJEET SINGH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1037 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 14/07/2022 in Appeal No. 949/2018 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Petitioner(s)Versus1. SUHANI GARG............

Case Number: 1037

|

Date of Filing: 25-04-2023

|

Date of Upload: 26-03-2024

Uttar Pradesh

GREATER NOIDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAMKISHAN

Development Authority  

Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar

Appelant Advocate RAJEEV GEHLOT

Respondant Advocate

FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSIONGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/376/2018( Date of Filing : 16 Aug 2018 )1. RAMKISHAN297, WARD NO 22, DEV COLONY ROHTAK HARIYANA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. GREATER NOIDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHOR...

Case Number: 376

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2018

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2024

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.