Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
RAKESH SHARMA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VRINDA KAPOOR DEV
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 254
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2024
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2024
RAKESH SHARMA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Delhi Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1021
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2024
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2024
MAHESH DHIMAN V/S GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Greater Mohali Area Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANDEEP BHARDWAJ ADV.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH[ADDL. BENCH]Appeal No. :A/207/2023Date of Institution:30.08.2023Date of Decision:30.04.20241. Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector 62, S.A.S. Nagar, Punjab, through its Chief Administrator.2. ...
Case Number: 207
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2023
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2024
BHOPAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MAJOR GENERAL MPS KANDAL
Court Name: Bhopal-II
Appelant Advocate URVASHI MISHRA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2022
|
Date of Upload: 14-05-2024
GREATOR MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAJ KUMARI AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF SH. VED PARKASH ARYA
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Before the Upbhokta Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., ChandigarhEA/99/2023in CC/698/2021Raj Kumari Vs Greater Mohali Area Development Authority & anr. BEFORE: PAWANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBER...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2023
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2024
KAMAL V/S MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MDA)
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RACHIT MITTAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1578 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 11/07/2013 in Appeal No. 855/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MDA)...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. KAMAL ...........Respo...
Case Number: 1578
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2022
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2024
Agra Development Authority V/S Km. Manju
Development Authority Agra Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devansh Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/551/2024( Date of Filing : 24 Apr 2024 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/05/2022 in Case No. CC/46/2014 of District Agra-II)1. Km. Manju village dhau...
Case Number: 551
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2024
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2024
Lucknow Development Authority V/S Chand Babu
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/49/2024( Date of Filing : 21 Feb 2024 )InEA/01/20241. Chand Babuaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Lucknow Development Authorityaaa.....
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2024
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2024
PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER V/S RAJESH KUMAR
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV DEEPAK KANSAL
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2024
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2024
PUNJAB URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER V/S AKSHAT NAHPAL
Development Authority Punjab Urban Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV DEEPAK KANSAL
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2024
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2024
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.