company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Chandigarh

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Raj Kumar Malik

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Sanjiv Gupta

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/836/2021Date of Institution:02/12/2021Date of Decision:18/06/2024Raj Kumar Malik S/o Late Sh.Chattar Singh Malik, GPA Holder/Will Holder for Allottees (Sh.Harjeet Singh S/o Sh.Harbans Singh...

Case Number: 836

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-06-2024

Chandigarh

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Rekha Rani

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Sanjiv Gupta

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/889/2021Date of Institution:13/12/2021Date of Decision:18/06/2024Rekha Rani W/o Sh.Naveen Kumar,Naveen Kumar S/o Sh.Om Parkash, both R/o H.No.2189, Sector 21-C, Chandigarh.… Complain...

Case Number: 889

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 18-06-2024

Chandigarh

GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR V/S NARENDRA PAL SINGH

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate RANJINDER SINGH SIDHU

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/323/2023( Date of Filing : 23 Nov 2023 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/11/2023 in Case No. CC/90/2021 of District DF-II)1. NARENDRA PAL SINGHHOUSE NO 522 SECTOR 20-A CHANDIGARHCHANDIGARHCHANDIGARH............

Case Number: 323

|

Date of Filing: 23-11-2023

|

Date of Upload: 14-06-2024

Chandigarh

NARENDRA PAL SINGH V/S GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHER

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SWATI DAYALAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/54/2024( Date of Filing : 31 Jan 2024 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/11/2023 in Case No. CC/90/2021 of District DF-II)1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANOTHERFLAT NO.104/2 , SECTOR 16-ACHA...

Case Number: 54

|

Date of Filing: 31-01-2024

|

Date of Upload: 14-06-2024

Uttar Pradesh

Bareilly Development Authority V/S Dr Alka Tomer

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Deepak Mehrotra & V.P. Srivastava

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2006/1363( Date of Filing : 04 May 2006 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Dr Alka Tomera...........Appellant...

Case Number: 2006

|

Date of Filing: 04-05-2006

|

Date of Upload: 12-06-2024

NCDRC

VIJAY GAUTAM V/S GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHANTANU KRISHNA

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGGARWAL (AMICUS CURIAE)

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2322 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 25/02/2011 in Appeal No. 1795/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYthrough its Vice Chariman, VikaspathGHAZIABADUP.............

Case Number: 2322

|

Date of Filing: 08-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 10-06-2024

NCDRC

BACHHI DEVI THROUGH HER LRS V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANIMESH KUMAR GABA & MR. SHIVA KHANDELWAL

Respondant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KR. JHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1621 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 09/04/2021 in Appeal No. 462/2015 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. BACHHI DEVI THROUGH HER LRS.............

Case Number: 1621

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2022

|

Date of Upload: 11-06-2024

Punjab

Jalandhar Development Authority V/S Mohan Singh S/o Kabal Singh

Development Authority   Jalandhar Development Authority  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate S.K. Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionLadowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/295/2022( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2022 )1. Mohan Singh S/o Kabal SinghMohalla Tibba Sahib, HoshiarpurHoshiarpurPUNJAB.........

Case Number: 295

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2022

|

Date of Upload: 18-06-2024

Punjab

Jalandhar Development Authority V/S Mohan Singh S/o Kabal Singh

Development Authority   Jalandhar Development Authority  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate S.K. Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionLadowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/296/2022( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2022 )1. Mohan Singh S/o Kabal SinghMohalla Tibba Sahib, HoshiarpurHoshiarpurPUNJAB.........

Case Number: 296

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2022

|

Date of Upload: 18-06-2024

Punjab

Jalandhar Development Authority V/S Mohan Singh S/o Kabal Singh

Development Authority   Jalandhar Development Authority  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate S.K. Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionLadowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/297/2022( Date of Filing : 22 Aug 2022 )1. Mohan Singh S/o Kabal SinghMohanna Tibba Sahib, HoshiarpurHoshiarpurPUNJAB.........

Case Number: 297

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2022

|

Date of Upload: 18-06-2024

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.