company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3630 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Kanpur Development Authority V/S Joginder Singh

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Prasoon Dixit & Pramendra Verma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/224/2024( Date of Filing : 13 Aug 2024 )In1. Joginder Singh 127/146 new block nirala nagar kanpur nagar...........Appellant(s)Versus...

Case Number: 224

|

Date of Filing: 13-08-2024

|

Date of Upload: 21-08-2024

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH BALBIR SINGH DAHIYA

Development Authority   Delhi Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II UDYOG SADAN C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/136/2018( Date of Filing : 09 May 2018 )1. SH BALBIR SINGH DAHIYAF-4/12 2nd FLOOR MODEL TOWN, DELHI 110009...........Complainan...

Case Number: 136

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 27-08-2024

NCDRC

SUREKHA SINGLA V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (P.U.D.A)

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHUBHAM BHALLA

Respondant Advocate RAJIV K BHATIA, VANSH MALHOTRA & SONAM PRIYA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 131 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 05/11/2020 in Complaint No. 213/2020 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (P.U.D.A)THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER, BATHINDA DEVELOP...

Case Number: 131

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2024

Punjab

Delhi Development Authority V/S Anil Shah

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: Amritsar

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 46

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2024

|

Date of Upload: 22-08-2024

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Yugal Kishore

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 372

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 14-08-2024

Gujarat

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUDHA MISHRA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate SUDHA MISHRA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 17-08-2024

NCDRC

RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PRABOTH KUMAR SHUKLA

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR BHAWNANI

Respondant Advocate MR. MOHIT D. RAM & MR. RAJUL SHRIVASTAV

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2425 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 25/06/2015 in Appeal No. 346/2014 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. PRABODH KUMAR SHUKLAS/O LATE SHRI SHIVKUMAR SHUKLA, R/O FRIEND STDPCO, TATIBANDH CHOWK, N...

Case Number: 1099

|

Date of Filing: 08-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 12-08-2024

NCDRC

LALIT KUMAR PHOOL V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ISHAAN SWARANA SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2059 OF 2024(Against the Order dated 27/06/2024 in Appeal No. A/435/2024 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHISOUTH EASTDELHI...........Petitioner(s)Ve...

Case Number: 2059

|

Date of Filing: 24-07-2024

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2024

NCDRC

RAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PRABODH KUMAR SHUKLA

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR BHAWNANI

Respondant Advocate MR. RAJUL KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA & MR. MOHIT D. RAM

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2425 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 25/06/2015 in Appeal No. 346/2014 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. PRABODH KUMAR SHUKLAS/O LATE SHRI SHIVKUMAR SHUKLA, R/O FRIEND STDPCO, TATIBANDH CHOWK, N...

Case Number: 2425

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 12-08-2024

NCDRC

PREM JINDAL V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Jindal  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN

Respondant Advocate MR. GURJINDER SINGH CHAHAL & MR. NAEEM ILYAS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3422 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 08/06/2017 in Appeal No. 498/2016 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER (NOW BATHINDA DEVELOPMEN...

Case Number: 3422

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 05-08-2024

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.