Dental
Latest Judgments
Total 470 Consumer Court Cases Against Dental.
1.Dr.M.A.Indira, Malabar Dental clinic, Hospital Road, Thalassery V/S Sheela, Deepam House, Kokapuram, Gopalpetta, Tellicherry
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate P.Dilesh kumar
Respondant Advocate Vinodkumar chambalan
In The Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumKannurconsumer case(CC) No. CC/173/2005 Sheela, Deepam House, Kokapuram, Gopalpetta, Tellicherry ...........Appellant(s)Vs.2.Dr.P.K.Ratnakaran Malabar Dental Clinic,Hospital Road,Thalassery 1.Dr.M.A.Indira, Malabar Dental clinic, Hospital ...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 29-06-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Sai Super Speciality Dental Clinic V/S Smt. P. Narayanamma
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sri J.Lokesh Reddy
Respondant Advocate Mr. K. Madhava Reddy
First Appeal No. FA/626/06(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Chittoor-I)1. Smt. P. NarayanammaH/o T. Sattevaripalem Village and Post Chinna Gottigallu Md.Chittoor Dist. BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDERA.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD....
Case Number: 626
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Dr. Muralidhara Reddy, S/o. Not known, Kurnool Super Specialty Dental Hospital V/S P.V.K.Sai Prasad, S/o. Late P. Ramachandra Rao, Inspector Prohibition and Excise, District Task Force,
Court Name: Kurnool
Appelant Advocate Sri.P.Nirajn Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sri.S.Chand Basha
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/18/20081. P.V.K.Sai Prasad, S/o. Late P. Ramachandra Rao, Inspector Prohibition and Excise, District Task Force,R/o. Sankar Bagh, KurnoolKurnoolAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dr. Muralidhara Reddy, S/o. Not known, Kurnool Sup...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Bangalore Institute of Dental Science V/S Pooja Choudhary
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate C.Venkatesh
Respondant Advocate G.Nagarajulu Naidu
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSLAL FORUM, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE.Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Cauvery Bhavan, 8th Floor, BWSSB Bldg., K. G. Rd., Bangalore-09.consumer case(CC) No. CC/1200/08 Pooja Choudhary ...........Appella...
Case Number: 1200
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Dr. A. M. Vare Refined Dear Associations Of Managements of United Private Medical and Dental College V/S Miss. Farul Harsh Kothari
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Grace Dental Clinic V/S M.Uma
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2581
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2006
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2020
Altratek Cement Ltd. V/S C.G. Dental Collage
Court Name: Rajnandgaon
Appelant Advocate Shri Prakash Kankariya
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/05/881. C.G. Dental CollageSundara, Th-Rajnandgaon(c.g.)...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Altratek Cement Ltd.Dhamda Road, Durg, Jila-Durg(c.g.)2. Cement HousePurana Bus Stand Road, RajandgaonRajnandgaonc.g.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. श्...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Dr. Kiran.G, Vinayaka Dental Clinic, V/S S. Srinivasamurthy,
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009consumer case(CC) No. CD/2005/228 S. Srinivasamurthy, ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Dr. Kiran.G, Vinayaka Dental Clinic, ...........Respondent(s...
Case Number: 2005
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MANIBAA DENTAL CLINICS OWNER Dr.HARSHAD C. PATEL V/S MANILAL PRANJIVAN RUPARELIYA
Court Name: Navsari
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2001
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2019
Maheshvari Dental Clinic V/S Anantray Parekh
Court Name: Rajkot
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2004
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dental in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dental ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dental under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.