company-name-logo

Dental

Latest Judgments

Total 474 Consumer Court Cases Against Dental.

Karnataka

Director /Principal Oxford Dental College &Hospital V/S K. Raja Reddy

Dental  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/14271. K. Raja ReddyPlot-7, 169E, 2nd Cross, 5th Main Thyappa Garden, Bilekahalli IIM (Po) Bannerghatta Road,...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

Dr.Partha Sarathi,Managing Director, Partha Dental Hospital V/S A.M.Janardhan, S/o Ayyappa, Proprietor Siva Jyothi Computer Institute

Hospital   Institute   Computer   Dental  

Court Name: Kurnool

Appelant Advocate P.Siva Sudarshan

Respondant Advocate G.Ramaiah Pillai

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/110/20111. A.M.Janardhan, S/o Ayyappa, Proprietor Siva Jyothi Computer InstituteD.No.8-26/21, Kambalapadu Road, Dhone- 518 222, Kurnool DistrictKurnool Andhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dr.Partha Sarathi,Managing Director, Parth...

Case Number: 110

|

Date of Filing: 06-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCINCE V/S ANKUR SHRIVASTAV

Dental  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 562

|

Date of Filing: 04-05-2009

|

Date of Upload: 04-04-2016

Madhya Pradesh

COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCINCE V/S DR. KHUSHBOO BADJATYA

Dental  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 29

|

Date of Filing: 02-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2016

Andhra Pradesh

Sri Sai Dental College and Research Institute and another V/S Shaik Ibrahim AND another

Institute   Dental  

Court Name: Guntur

Appelant Advocate CONSUMER CARE CENTER

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGUNTURComplaint Case No. CC/11/1871. Shaik Ibrahim AND anotherS/o. Nagoor Meeravali, R/o. D.No.16-4-241, Gandhi Bomma Centre, Old Guntur. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. A Hazarath Rao PRESIDENT SMT T. SUNEETHA, M.S.W., B.L., MEMBERHONORABLE Sri M.V.L. Radha ...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 11-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

DENTAL COLLEG V/S SANGITA GUPTA

Dental  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 461

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

DENTAL COLLEG V/S SU. BARKHA JAIN

Dental  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 254

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2016

NCDRC

ARCHITA VEDI V/S CHAIRMAN, DESH BHAGAT DENTAL COLLEGE & ORS.

Dental  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. LAWYER'S KNIT & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 28/07/2011 in Appeal No. 283/2006 of the State Commission Punjab)1. CHAIRMAN, DESH BHAGAT DENTAL COLLEGE & ORS.Kotkapura Road,MuktsarPunjab2. Principal Desh Bhagat ...

Case Number: 3744

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2012

Karnataka

The Principal M.S.Ramaish Dental College V/S Ms.Asha Francis

Dental  

Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 135

|

Date of Filing: 20-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2022

NCDRC

M/S. VIJAY NAGAR HOSPITAL & DENTAL CLINIC & ORS. V/S MAHESH CHAND SHARMA & ORS.

Hospital   Clinic   Dental  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. K.G. SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 263 OF 20111. MAHESH CHAND SHARMA & ORS............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. VIJAY NAGAR HOSPITAL & DENTAL CLINIC & ORS............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBE...

Case Number: 263

|

Date of Filing: 15-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2011

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dental in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dental ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dental under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.