Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. raj Kumar Bashmboo Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/16/20141. Miss kanta KhannaChd. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBERHON'ABLE MRS. PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No.:16 of 2014Da...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. T.M. Swamy
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAICHUR, SATH KACHERI, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, RAICHUR-584101, KARNATAKA STATE.Ph.No. 08532-233006.Complaint Case No. CC/13/591. Miss. Solani Sinha D/o. Praful Chandra Singh RaichurP.C. Sinha aged 20 years, Occ: BDS StudentDarjeelingSikki...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. N. Harinath Reddy
Respondant Advocate M/s. P. Achyatham Reddy
CC NO. 106 Of 20121. Yusupova Saodat,D/o.Yusufpov Arkut,53 years,R/o.3-6-19\81/1/C.\,Hyderguda,Hyderabad............Complainant(s)Versus1. Dr.Sowjanya Kancha,M/s.Sowjanya Dental Hospital,#1,2,3,I Floor,Shreemukth Complex,Himayath Nagar,Hyderabad-29.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE...
Case Number: 106
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. N. Harinath Reddy
Respondant Advocate M/s. P. Achyatham Reddy
CC NO. 106 Of 20121. Yusupova Saodat,D/o.Yusufpov Arkut,53 years,R/o.3-6-19\81/1/C.\,Hyderguda,Hyderabad............Complainant(s)Versus1. Dr.Sowjanya Kancha,M/s.Sowjanya Dental Hospital,#1,2,3,I Floor,Shreemukth Complex,Himayath Nagar,Hyderabad-29.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE...
Case Number: 106
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Geeta Gulati Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Narinder Sharma, Adv. for OP no. 1 &2.Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv. for Sh. Paras Money Goyal, Adv. for OP 3
Complaint Case No. CC/36/20131. Ms. Diane GreenLondon...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Advanced Dental care CentreUT2. Dr. Anshu Gupta, Advanced Dental Care Centre, No. 20, First Floor, Sector-18/A, Chandigarh-160018 Punjab3. Dr. J.Nagpal Shivalik HospitalMohali Sector-69, SAS na...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Jalna
Appelant Advocate T.S.Paikrao
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 9 Of 20121. Gopinath Datta jagtap Dhagi (borgaon) Tq.Dist JalnaJalnaMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dr. Santosh Gavhane ,Varad Dental HoapitalBenzanji Road,Kadrabad,New Jalna.Jalna.Maharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. NEELIMA SANT PRESIDENT...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAT NAVET
Respondant Advocate MR. H. CHANDRA SEKHAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2022 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/02/2012 in Appeal No. 2075/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. DR. M. KALA, HOD & PROFESSOR, GOVERNMENT DENTAL COLLEGER/o 1106,1st Sector, HSR layoutBangal...
Case Number: 2022
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2013
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2021
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGION OF LAWYERS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 337 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/07/2011 in Appeal No. 59/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. RAJWINDER KAURGouse No-25, sector-18-A ChandigarhChandigarh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DE...
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
Court Name: Rajnandgaon
Appelant Advocate Shri Shatrughan Tode
Respondant Advocate Shri Thamos Anthoni
Complaint Case No. CC/13/491. Ku. Manju Patres/o Sonsingh Patre Add. Vill. Madadih, P.O. Kanki, RaipurRaipurC.G............Complainant(s)Versus1. C.G. Dental College & Research Instituteth. Principal/ Director c.g.dental college & Rea.Ins.Sundra, RajnandgonRajnandgaonC.G............
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dental in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dental ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dental under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.