Court Name: Central Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/105/20151. SANJAY KUMAR CHANDNA21519/9 WEST PATEL NAGAR, NEW DELHI............Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI JAL BOARDVARUNALYA, JHANDEWALAN EXTN. NEW DELHI -110005.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RAKESH KAPOOR PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. ...
Case Number: 105
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2015
Court Name: Central Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/105/20131. VIPIN KUMAR JAINC-193, PUSHPANJALI ENCLAVE, PITAMPURA , DELHI 34...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI JAL BOARDDELHI JAL BORD ZRO, KAKROLA, NAJAFGARH, ND ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RAKESH KAPOOR PRESIDENTHON'BLE ...
Case Number: 105
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2015
Court Name: Central Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/107/20131. SITA DEVIH NO. 3216, GALI NO 8, RANJIT NAGAR ND ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI JAL BOARDGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI, RAJENDER NAGAR ND ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAPOOR PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. JUSTIC...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2015
Court Name: Central Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/136/20131. SH. JOGINDER KUMARR/O A-6/169.JANTA FLAT,PASCHIM VIHAR, ND 63...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI JAL BOARDHQ VARUNALYA COMPLAX PHASE 1 JHANDEWALAN ND 55............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RAKESH KAPOOR PRESIDENTHON'BLE ...
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-06-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MS. ARTI BANSAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3578 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/08/2011 in Appeal No. 804/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHANTI DEVIK-3/44 Gali No-12-A West GhondaDelhi - 53...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DELHI JAL BO...
Case Number: 3578
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARESH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 762 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 09/12/2013 in Appeal No. 874/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARDTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, VARUNALAYA BUILDING, JHANDEWALANNEW DELHI - 110055..............
Case Number: 762
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2014
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVIENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92CC No.523/2014:In the matter of:Sh. M.C.JoshiThrough General AttorneySh. S.C.Nirwani22, Mausam Vihar, Delhi – 110 051ComplainantVs.Delhi Jal BoradVaruna...
Case Number: 523
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 19-06-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR VERMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1962 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/03/2013 in Appeal No. 662/2012 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/3238/20131. ZRO, DELHI JAL BOARDTHROUGH SHRI VED PAL, METER READER, C/O ZONAL REVENUE OFFI...
Case Number: 1962
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4676 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/11/2013 in Appeal No. 377/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/7739/20131. DELHI JAL BOARDEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARAM PURA NEW DELHI - 110008...........Pet...
Case Number: 4676
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR VERMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3020 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/05/2012 in Appeal No. 84/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARDThrough Executive Engineer NajafgarhNew DelhiDelhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 3020
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Delhi Jal Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Delhi Jal Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Delhi Jal Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.