company-name-logo

Delhi Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 326 Consumer Court Cases Against Delhi Development Authority.

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANOTHER V/S SHRI. SHIV SHANKAR

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R. R. SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4699 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 15/09/2010 in Appeal No. 309/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHRI. SHIV SHANKARR/o. C/o. Shri Rama Nand, H. No. G-47/2, 2nd Floor, Room No. 27, Main Market, C...

Case Number: 4699

|

Date of Filing: 27-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2011

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S M/S. PADIA TIMBER CO.

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. JINENDRA JAIN

Respondant Advocate MS. MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 106 OF 20011. M/S. PADIA TIMBER CO.WH 5 FURNITURE BLOCKKIRITI NAGAR NEW DELHI ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADANNEW DELHI NA...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE...

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2001

|

Date of Upload: 21-01-2011

NCDRC

F.S. CHAUHAN V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PRADUMAN KUMAR AGGARWAL

Respondant Advocate IN PERSON

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 621 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 18/10/2005 in Appeal No. 507/2003 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN I.N.A. NEW DELHI NEW DELHI ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 621

|

Date of Filing: 13-03-2006

|

Date of Upload: 20-01-2011

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MUKUL SRIVASTAVA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2594 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 13/07/2010 in Appeal No. 500/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MUKUL SRIVASTAVAR/o. 233, (1st Floor), S.B.I. Colony, Paschim ViharNew Delhi - 110063Delhi..........

Case Number: 2594

|

Date of Filing: 16-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2010

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH JAGDEEP BALI

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/833/2009( Date of Filing : 19 Nov 2009 )1. SH JAGDEEP BALIHOUSE NO. 843 SECTOR-17A GURGAON HARYAN...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI D...

Case Number: 833

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 17-09-2018

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MOHAN LAL

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DHARAM RAJ OHLAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2545 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/05/2010 in Appeal No. 134/2010 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. MOHAN LALR/o. 134/22, Shiv Nagar, Peer Wali GaliPanipatHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. D...

Case Number: 2545

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 22-09-2010

NCDRC

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ASHOK KUMAR GOEL

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINOD PANT

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2822 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 01/07/2010 in Appeal No. 380/2010 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. ASHOK KUMAR GOEL5-A/3-A, Ansari Road, Darya GanjNew DelhiDelhi ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. D...

Case Number: 2822

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 23-08-2010

NCDRC

GAURAV GARG & ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1475 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 19/01/2010 in Appeal No. 706/2009 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThe Vice-Chairman, Delhi Development Authority, D Block, 2nd Floor, Se...

Case Number: 1475

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2010

NCDRC

SURINDER KAUR KOHLI, W/O LATE AMARJEET SINGH KOHLI & ORS. V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. GIRIJA WADHWA

Respondant Advocate M/S. KIMMI BRARA MARWAHA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. 105 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 04/07/2008 in Complaint No. 69/2000 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVikas Sadan, INANew Delhi ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SURINDER KAUR KO...

Case Number: 105

|

Date of Filing: 23-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 05-07-2010

Delhi

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH MUKUL SRIVASTAVA

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: South Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/413/2007( Date of Filing : 13 Mar 2007 )1. SH MUKUL SRIVASTAVAHOUSE NO. 233 1ST FLOOR SBI COLONY PASCHIM VIHAR, NEW DELHI 110063.............

Case Number: 413

|

Date of Filing: 13-03-2007

|

Date of Upload: 12-10-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Delhi Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Delhi Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Delhi Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.