company-name-logo

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam

Latest Judgments

Total 258 Consumer Court Cases Against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam.

NCDRC

RAM KISHAN V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ORS

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2272 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 03/09/2007 in Appeal No. 2329/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ORSMANAGING DIRECTOR DHBVNL VIDYUT NAGAR HISAR ...

Case Number: 2272

|

Date of Filing: 02-07-2007

|

Date of Upload: 14-07-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S KANWAR SINGH

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH K. MUDGAL

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2482-2483 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 30/04/2010 in Appeal No. 3070/02,212/10 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KANWAR SINGHR/o. Petaudi Road, Haily Mandi, Tehsil PataudiGurgaonHaryana...........P...

Case Number: 2482

|

Date of Filing: 09-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-04-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S KIRAN RAI KHATRI

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MUKAND GUPTA

Respondant Advocate M/S. JURIS PERITUS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3191 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 14/05/2009 in Appeal No. 1919/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KIRAN RAI KHATRIS/o.Late J.D. Khatri . Resident of Village. Bagan Ki. sub Tehsil Tauru. Gurgao...

Case Number: 3191

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 21-01-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S M/S. ANAND PLASTIC

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate DR. RAMESH KUMAR HARITASH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3888 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 02/08/2010 in Appeal No. 850/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. ANAND PLASTICR/o. VPO BaporaBhiwaniHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA...

Case Number: 3888

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 13-01-2011

NCDRC

SUKHPAL V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. MADAN LAL GARG

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3753 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 09/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1725/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.SUB , DIVISIONAL OFFICER , OPERSTION SUB DIVISION BHUNA...

Case Number: 3753

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-2006

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2011

NCDRC

SATPAL V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. MADAN LAL GARG

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3754 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 09/04/2006 in Appeal No. 1726/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.SUB DICISIONAL OFFICER OPERSTION SUB DICISION BHUNA DI...

Case Number: 3754

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-2006

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2011

NCDRC

NAND LAL V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1276 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 06/11/2009 in Appeal No. 2412/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through its Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Urban, Sub Divi...

Case Number: 1276

|

Date of Filing: 01-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 28-10-2010

NCDRC

SHAMSHER SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1081 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/10/2009 in Appeal No. 2800/2002 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.Through its Assistant Executive Engineer, Sub...

Case Number: 1081

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 20-10-2010

NCDRC

KARAN SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1474 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 13/08/2009 in Appeal No. 1077/2009 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Sub Divisional Officer (OP), Sub Division Model Town, D...

Case Number: 1474

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2010

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM V/S MOHINDER SINGH

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. LAW & LEGAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1484 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 14/01/2010 in Appeal No. 929/2005 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. MOHINDER SINGHVillage:- Jharsa, Tehsil & District:- GurgaonGurgaonHaryana ...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 1484

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2010

|

Date of Upload: 23-06-2010

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.