company-name-logo

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam

Latest Judgments

Total 258 Consumer Court Cases Against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam.

NCDRC

ARCHANA & ORS. V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3262 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 05/07/2011 in Appeal No. 176/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through its S.D.O, 'O.P' Sub Division CitySirsaHaryana.....

Case Number: 3262

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 08-12-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S M/S. RAJ SAW MILLS

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. SHAHID ALI & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 364 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 09/05/2011 in Complaint No. 3204/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. RAJ SAW MILLSThrough its Partner Sh. Satish Kumar Arora, Barahi- Talab Road, Old Faridabad-1...

Case Number: 364

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S NAND LAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2485 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/01/2011 in Appeal No. 356/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NAND LALS/o Madan Lal, C/o Super Bakery, Oil Railway Road,GurgoanHaryana...........Petitioner(s...

Case Number: 2485

|

Date of Filing: 22-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2011

NCDRC

SATYA NARAIN V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ANR.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3100 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 06/01/2007 in Appeal No. 320/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ANR.OP SUB DIVISION. JAKHAL, DISTRICT FATEHABAD, H...

Case Number: 3100

|

Date of Filing: 12-09-2007

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2011

NCDRC

M/S. KHOSLA AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ANR .

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3099 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 06/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1906/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ANR . THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SUB DIV...

Case Number: 3099

|

Date of Filing: 12-09-2007

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S SURESH KUMAR

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. V.K. RAVI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 914 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/12/2010 in Appeal No. 1179/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SURESH KUMARR/o. Village Devsar, Tehsil and District BhiwaniBhiwaniHaryana...........Petitioner...

Case Number: 914

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 20-10-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S RAJENDER AGGARWAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4701 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 25/10/2010 in Appeal No. 3515/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJENDER AGGARWALPlot No. 117, Sector-21, Industrial AreaBhiwaniHaryana...........Petitioner(s...

Case Number: 4701

|

Date of Filing: 28-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 24-10-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD & ORS. V/S SUBHASH AGGARWAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. JASBIR SINGH MALIK

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1142 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/01/2011 in Appeal No. 1738/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUBHASH AGGARWAL Resident of 227, Vijay Nagar, Hansi RoadBhiwaniHaryana...........Petitioner(s...

Case Number: 1142

|

Date of Filing: 07-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 19-09-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ANR. V/S KRISHAN LAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M.A. HASNAIN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2148 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 15/09/2010 in Appeal No. 2878/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KRISHAN LALR/O RANAI WARD NO-4 RANIA SIRSAHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARY...

Case Number: 2148

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 04-08-2011

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S KANWALJEET KAUR

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MRS. AVNISH AHLAWAT

Respondant Advocate +2/

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1156 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 27/10/2010 in Appeal No. 3161/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KANWALJEET KAURPROP.M/S K.B INDRUSTRIES,PLOT NO 36.16/2 MATHUR ROADFARIDABADHARYANA..............

Case Number: 1156

|

Date of Filing: 08-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2011

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.