company-name-logo

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam

Latest Judgments

Total 258 Consumer Court Cases Against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam.

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S GULSHAN JAIN

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 61 OF 2012 IN RP/3486/20111. GULSHAN JAIN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE ...

Case Number: 61

|

Date of Filing: 28-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-06-2012

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ANR. V/S SUBODH MEHRA

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. RAJEEV KAPOOR & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 294 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/10/2011 in Appeal No. 2549/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUBODH MEHRAS/o Shri KJ Mehra, R/o I-750 Palam ViharGurgaonharyana...........Petitioner(s)Versu...

Case Number: 294

|

Date of Filing: 23-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-04-2012

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S M/S. TOOLS INDIA

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1271 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/08/2011 in Appeal No. 714/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. TOOLS INDIAPlot No-81,Sector-26 Industrial Area Through its PropritorBhiwaniHaryana..........

Case Number: 1271

|

Date of Filing: 27-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2012

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED V/S DARSHAN KUMAR

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. JINENDRA JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3836 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1541/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DARSHAN KUMARS/o late Sh Ram Chander, R/o Modern Juice, Nehru Market Opp Govt School, Tohana F...

Case Number: 3836

|

Date of Filing: 24-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 20-03-2012

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S SAVITRI DEVI

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate DR. RAMESH KUMAR HARITASH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3493 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 15/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1152/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SAVITRI DEVIW/o Sh jai Narain, R/o 341/22 Gali No-11, Jawahar NagarHissarHaryana...........Pet...

Case Number: 3493

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 08-02-2012

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S GULSHAN JAIN

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3486 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 23/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1184/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GULSHAN JAINS/o Shri Tara Chand 606/4/27,Gali No-8, madan PuriGurgoan - 122001Haryana............

Case Number: 3486

|

Date of Filing: 20-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 20-01-2012

NCDRC

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CITY) DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S BABU LAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3188 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/04/2011 in Appeal No. 1522/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BABU LALRegional Office, LIC building,2nd Floor, Jagadhri Road,AmbalaHaryana...........Petitio...

Case Number: 3188

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-01-2012

NCDRC

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S RAM CHANDER GAUR

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1075 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 21/01/2011 in Appeal No. 393/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAM CHANDER GAURR?o. Narheri, Tehril NarnaulMahendragarhHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 1075

|

Date of Filing: 30-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2011

NCDRC

M/S. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S M/S. DELITE THEATRE

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NARENDER VASHISHTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3191 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 20/12/2010 in Appeal No. 387/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. DELITE THEATRER/o Chautala Road,Mandi DabwaliSirsaHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...

Case Number: 3191

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2011

NCDRC

VIJAY SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3550 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 05/01/2007 in Appeal No. 666/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORSSUB DIVISION OFFICER (CITY)O.P SUB DIVISION FATEHA...

Case Number: 3550

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2007

|

Date of Upload: 12-12-2011

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.