company-name-logo

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam

Latest Judgments

Total 258 Consumer Court Cases Against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam.

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S KRISHAN KUMAR

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. JASBIR SINGH MALIK

Respondant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 783 OF 2013 IN RP/2349/20101. KRISHAN KUMAR...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, P...

Case Number: 783

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2014

NCDRC

SATYA NARAIN V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ANR.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2014 IN RP/108/20131. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. SATYA NARAIN...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 06-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S KANWAR SINGH

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH K. MUDGAL

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 785 OF 2013 IN RP/2482-2483/20101. KANWAR SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRES...

Case Number: 785

|

Date of Filing: 10-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S JAI NARAIN

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ASHOK KR. MISHRA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3400 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 06/07/2011 in Appeal No. 751/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. JAI NARAINS/o Sh Jogi Ram, R/o Kirti Nagar, Bhiwani,TehsilbhiwaniHaryana...........Petitioner(s...

Case Number: 3400

|

Date of Filing: 12-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2014

NCDRC

RAM CHANDER V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2827 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 22/01/2008 in Appeal No. 3302/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDSub Division City Tohana FatehabadHaryana..............

Case Number: 2827

|

Date of Filing: 09-07-2008

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2014

NCDRC

DES RAJ V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2855 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 18/02/2008 in Appeal No. 3278/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED Operation Sub Division, DHBVNL, RaniaSirsaHaryana.....

Case Number: 2855

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2008

|

Date of Upload: 03-01-2014

NCDRC

HANS RAJ V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1107 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/07/2007 in Appeal No. 2715/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISION, ...

Case Number: 1107

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2013

NCDRC

S.D.O. 'OP' DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S NATHA SINGH

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. BSK LEGAL

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2459 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/04/2011 in Appeal No. 1395/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NATHA SINGHS/o Sh Panja Singh, R/o Kutta Badh, SirsaHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S....

Case Number: 2459

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2013

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S SUKHDARSHAN SINGH

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. RITU PURI & MR. JARNAIL SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 800 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 22/07/2011 in Appeal No. 754/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUKHDARSHAN SINGHR/o Moyondkalan tehsiFatehabadHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN H...

Case Number: 800

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2013

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S MUKESH MALIK

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1092 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/10/2011 in Appeal No. 952/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MUKESH MALIKThrough its user M/s Pardhan Enterprsises, Through its Proprietor, Shri Ashish Prad...

Case Number: 1092

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.