company-name-logo

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam

Latest Judgments

Total 258 Consumer Court Cases Against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam.

NCDRC

CHIRANJI LAL V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN

Respondant Advocate MR SANJAY SINGH.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1040 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 26/11/2007 in Appeal No. 2747/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DISTRICT HISAR, ...

Case Number: 1040

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 01-05-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S HARYANA TOURISM CORPORATION LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1356 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/10/2011 in Appeal No. 1487/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA TOURISM CORPORATION LTD.Through its Sub Divisional officer,DharuheraRewari...........P...

Case Number: 1356

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-05-2014

NCDRC

BAL KRISHAN V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 829 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 23/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1833/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISION...

Case Number: 829

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 23-04-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S GURTEJ SINGH

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN GOGIA & MRS. JASPREET GOGIA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4031 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1178/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GURTEJ SINGHR/o Budhladha Road, Ratia, tehsil RatiaFatehbadharyana...........Petitioner(s)Vers...

Case Number: 4031

|

Date of Filing: 13-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-04-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S SURAJ BHAN

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. P.K. CHUGH

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2689 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 25/04/2011 in Appeal No. 787/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SURAJ BHAN...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR..........

Case Number: 2689

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 09-04-2014

NCDRC

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S BALVINDER SINGH

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. BSK LEGAL

Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1426 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/01/2011 in Appeal No. 1048/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BALVINDER SINGHR/o. Vill. & P.O. Ding Road, Teh. & Distt. SirsaSirsaHaryana...........Petition...

Case Number: 1426

|

Date of Filing: 29-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S RISHI LAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP MEHTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2946 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1611/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RISHI LALS/o tara Chand, C/o Gulati Oil Mills TaruMewatHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 2946

|

Date of Filing: 05-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 03-04-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM V/S COL. M.S. YADAV

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH NAUTIYAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2056 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/11/2010 in Appeal No. 636/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. COL. M.S. YADAVRESIDENT OF VILLAGE TEENTH , TEHSILREWARIHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 2056

|

Date of Filing: 10-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 03-04-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ANR. V/S SUBHASH CHAND

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARUN KUMAR & MR. SAT PAL SINGLA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2849 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 04/08/2011 in Appeal No. 182/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/4902/2013,IA/4903/20131. SUBHASH CHANDS/O FAKIR CHAND, R/O VILLAGE DHARSUL TEHSIL TOHANA...

Case Number: 2849

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 25-03-2014

NCDRC

VINOD KUMAR V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 790 OF 2013 IN RP/1881/20081. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. VINOD KUMAR...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESID...

Case Number: 790

|

Date of Filing: 11-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.