company-name-logo

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam

Latest Judgments

Total 258 Consumer Court Cases Against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam.

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S MURARI LAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. J.S. JANGRA & MR. S.S. PANDEY

Respondant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 436 OF 2014 IN RP/2270/20121. MURARI LAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI...

Case Number: 436

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 10-10-2014

NCDRC

MUNISH KUMAR V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4266 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 01/08/2007 in Appeal No. 191/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR.THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION DIVISIO...

Case Number: 4266

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2007

|

Date of Upload: 28-08-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S MURARI LAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. J.S. JANGRA & MR. S.S. PANDEY

Respondant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2270 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1204/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MURARI LALS/o Shri Hanuman Prasad R/o Village Nangal Chowdhary, tehsil NarnaulMahendergarhHary...

Case Number: 2270

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 12-08-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S GURDEV SINGH

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. N.S. MALIK

Respondant Advocate Ms. Charu Sangwan

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3942 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/08/2011 in Appeal No. 978/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GURDEV SINGH...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR........

Case Number: 3942

|

Date of Filing: 05-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2014

NCDRC

ROHIT ARORA V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 411 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 23/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1948/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS SUB DIVISION OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISION, ...

Case Number: 411

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2008

|

Date of Upload: 16-07-2014

NCDRC

BHIM SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate MR. BIPIN K. DWIVEDI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1749 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 04/12/2009 in Appeal No. 1617/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Sub Divisional Officer, Operation City Sub Divi...

Case Number: 1749

|

Date of Filing: 07-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-05-2014

NCDRC

BIR SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR

Respondant Advocate MR. K.C. BANSAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 721 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 26/11/2009 in Appeal No. 1370/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through its Sub Divisinal Officer, Operation Sub Divisio...

Case Number: 721

|

Date of Filing: 10-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-05-2014

NCDRC

VED PRAKASH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. SUNDER KHATRI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2842 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 28/07/2006 in Appeal No. 1045/2000 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND ORS.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER OPERATION SUB , DIVISION...

Case Number: 2877

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2014

NCDRC

PREM KUMAR V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY SINGH

Respondant Advocate MR. SUNDER KHATRI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2842 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 28/07/2006 in Appeal No. 1045/2000 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND ORS.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER OPERATION SUB , DIVISION...

Case Number: 2878

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2014

NCDRC

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S KAMAL KUMAR SEHGAL

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. S.N. BHARDWAJ

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2872 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/10/2011 in Appeal No. 1773/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KAMAL KUMAR SEHGALS/o Sh M.L Sehgal R/o H.No-395,Sector-14,Urban EstateGurgaonharyana............

Case Number: 2872

|

Date of Filing: 06-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-05-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.