Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Harinder Kumar
Respondant Advocate r.s sharma
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 421/20131. SheelaDevi Widow of RohtasMaanehru...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.Hissar............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Ansuya Bishnoi MEMBER For the Complainant...
Case Number: 421
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2016
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA,PANCHKULA First Appeal No.881 of 2014Date of Institution: 07.10.2014 Date of Decision:25.02.2016Sitar Singh S/o Sh.Ganeshi Ram, R/o Village Sagarpur, Tehsil Narnaul, Distt.M/garh (Haryana). …..Appellant VersusDakshin Ha...
Case Number: 881
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2016
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Ramesh Sangwan
Respondant Advocate
C.C. No. 288 of 2013Smt. Sumitra Devi Vs DHBVNL etc.Present:- None for the complainant.Shri K.R. Sangwan, Advocate for Ops. Case called several times since morning but none appeared on behalf of the complainant. It is now 2.30 p.m, case called again but none appeared on behalf ...
Case Number: 288
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 264
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2016
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 387
|
Date of Filing: 20-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2016
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate M.S Mehara
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 160/20141. Lal Chand Son of Khali Ram r/o riwasa teh tosham...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.hissar............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Balraj Singh MEMBERHON'BLE M...
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2015
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate B.s Sihag
Respondant Advocate B.p Rapria
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 79/20121. Umed Singh Son of Chandgi ramR/o Ishwarwal BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Budh Dev Yadav PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Balraj Singh MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. Anita Sheoran MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERBEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES ...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2015
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J.S. JANGRA & MR. S.S. PANDEY
Respondant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 546 OF 2014 IN RP/2270/20121. MURARI LAL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI...
Case Number: 546
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2014
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.K. MEHTA & SANDEEP MEHTA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1477 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 26/02/2009 in Appeal No. 1835/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. P.C. SOOD, THROUGH VIVEK GOELProprietor Auto Needs. Mehrauli Road. Near Govt. College Gur...
Case Number: 1477
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2014
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVNEET KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2664 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 12/05/2011 in Appeal No. 928/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BRIJ PAL SINGHS/o Sh Hari Singh, R/o V& PO Khandsa, TehsilGurgoanHaryana...........Petitioner(s...
Case Number: 2664
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.