Courier
Latest Judgments
Total 2091 Consumer Court Cases Against Courier.
DTDC COURIER AND CARGO LTD ALUVA-683101 V/S HIGHTECH SERVICES
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate K.L.JOSEPH
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/761. HIGHTECH SERVICESREPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, JIMMY JOSEPH THAIKKATUKARA, ALUVA-683106 Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DTDC COURIER AND CARGO LTD ALUVA-683101ALUVA-683101 Kerala2. DTDC COURIER AND CARGO LTDREGISTERED OFFICE, DTDC HOUSE, N...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S DTDC COURIER & CARGO LTD., V/S ARAVIND BOSLAY
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate TOM JOSEPH
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/1921. ARAVIND BOSLAYGOKULAM, COURT ROAD MUVATTUPUZHA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S DTDC COURIER & CARGO LTD.,OF-757, VELLOORKUNNAM, MARKET P.O.,MUVATTUPUZHA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENTHONORABLE MR. PROF:PAUL GOME...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DTDC Courier Services V/S AF WWA(P) 101,AF STM, Surya Lanka
Court Name: Guntur
Appelant Advocate KSCR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM: : GUNTURComplaint Case No. CC/11/131. AF WWA(P) 101,AF STM, Surya LankaRep by its Stn.Commander, Amarindra Singh Gill, Bapatla, Guntur Guntur A.P...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DTDC Courier ServicesDTDC Courier Services, Rep by its Branch Man...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2017
D.T.D.C. Courier and Cargo Limited Kote Vinayak Services V/S Ms. Green Vally Organics Spices, Represented by its Partner, Raghavendra Shastry
Court Name: Uttara Kannda
Appelant Advocate Sri.R.S.Hegde
Respondant Advocate Sri.P.S.Bhat
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2020
On Dot Courier and Cargo Ltd V/S Rakesh Ranjan Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 171 of 2011 1. Rakesh Ranjan SinghS/o Sh Rameshwar Singh Proprietor of M/s Nano Biotech, SCO No - 164, First Floor, Sector - 38 C, Chandigarh .........
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
FIRST FLIGHT COURIER LTD V/S SHRI NIKHIL SURESH SUNTHWAL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SATYAJEET DIGHE
Respondant Advocate N P Noronha
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/10/4471. SHRI NIKHIL SURESH SUNTHWALRESIDING AT 686 SUNTHWAL WADA TELI LANE RRAVIVAR PETH NASHIKNASHIKMAHARASHTRA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. FIRST FLIGHT COURI...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
. The ANL Parcel & Courier Services, and others V/S Pooja Agencies, Kosgi, represented by its Proprietor
Court Name: Mahbubnagar
Appelant Advocate Sri G. Vikramdev
Respondant Advocate Sri Anantha Reddy,
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT MAHABUBNAGARFriday, the 29th day of July, 2011 Present:- Sri P. Sridhara Rao, B.Sc., LL.B., President Sri A. Veerupakshi, B.A., LL.B., Member Smt.D.Nirmala, B.Com., LL.B.,Memb...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2016
Madhur Courier V/S Satish K.Pathak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2017
DTDC Courier V/S Sh Kanwaljit Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 108 of 2011 1. Sh Kanwaljit Singhchd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. DTDC Courier chd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For ...
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Courier in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Courier ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Courier under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.