Courier
Latest Judgments
Total 2091 Consumer Court Cases Against Courier.
D T D C Courier Service V/S Vinitaben Shyambhai Raheja
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate S.K.Antani
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 20-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2020
Blazeflash courier ltd. V/S Rajesh Kumar
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate B.L.Sachdeva
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/1351. Rajesh Kumar sonof Sh. Jai Kishan r/o H.No.866, Shakti Nagar, Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Blazeflash courier ltd.Railway road, Bathinda through its manager/owner.2. Blazeflash courier ltd., corporate office: Blazeflash House,3rd floor ...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Niranjan Kishore Oza C/o.Maruti Courier V/S Vikrant Vasantrao Dewangswami
Court Name: Sangli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/09/23511. Vikrant Vasantrao DewangswamiLegene Opticals, Shop No.2, Pitashri Complex, Vantmure Corner, Miraj, Tal.Miraj, Dist.Sangli...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Niranjan Kishore Oza C/o.Maruti CourierNr.Basveshwar Transport, Shaniwar Peth, Miraj, Tal.Mir...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Branch Manager, The Professional Courier Pvt Ltd. V/S Shri Shivanand Narayan Nayak
Court Name: Uttara Kannda
Appelant Advocate J.P Naik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2020
Shri Sai Transport & Courier Pvt.Ltd., V/S Shri.Sanket Dileepkumar Shah
Court Name: Sangli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/10/1161. Shri.Sanket Dileepkumar ShahProp.Sanket Enterprises, 248, Mangalwar Peth, Madhavnagar, Dist.Sangli...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Shri Sai Transport & Courier Pvt.Ltd., Kushal Mangal Karyalaya Building, Kushalnagar, Jalna Road, Aurangabad - 4...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DTDC Courier &Cargo Ltd., V/S Rupam Ghosh,
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/12/5531. Rupam Ghosh,R/at S.No.33/2, Flat No.3, Prerna apartment, Nr. Beverly Hills Apt., Baner, Pune............Complainant(s)Versus1. DTDC Courier &Cargo Ltd.,Shop No.11, Aditi Mall, Nr., Hill View Residence, Baner, Pune-411 045.............Opp.Party(s) BE...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GATI COURIER SERVICE [KWE] V/S CHANDAN MUKHERJEE
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892Complaint Case No. CC/13/651. CHANDAN MUKHERJEEDakshin Para Duillya[CT], Sankrail, Howrah-711 302............Complainan...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Manager, DTDc Courier & Cargo Centre, V/S S.Vinoparani
Courier Dtdc Courier Cargo Dtdc
Court Name: Kanyakumari
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2015
ICL Courier and Logistics, Represented by its Director/Proprietor. V/S B.Papanna, S/o.B.Sriramulu
Court Name: Kurnool
Appelant Advocate G.CH.Lakshmaiah
Respondant Advocate S.Promod Kumar
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/88/20121. B.Papanna, S/o.B.SriramuluShop No.52-239/4, S.K.S. Complex, Old Bus Stand, Kurnool 518 001. Kurnool Andhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ICL Courier and Logistics, Represented by its Director/Proprietor.H.No.11/3,Rt.Opp.A...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PROPRIETOR MADHUR COURIER V/S RAKHI DHURIYA
Court Name: Katni
Appelant Advocate .......
Respondant Advocate .......
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Courier in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Courier ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Courier under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.