company-name-logo

Courier

Latest Judgments

Total 2091 Consumer Court Cases Against Courier.

Madhya Pradesh

MADHUR COURIER V/S MUKESH KUMAR VISHVAKARMA

Courier  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 18-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 15-06-2016

Meghalaya

FLYKING Courier Service V/S Shri Vikash Pradhan

Courier  

Court Name: East Khasi Hills

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONEAST KHASI HILLS, SHILLONGMEGHALAYAComplaint Case No. CC/18/2015( Date of Filing : 29 May 2015 )1. Shri Vikash Pradhan Riatsamthiah Block 4 Shillong 793001...........Complainant(s)Versus1. FLYKING Courier ServiceFLYKING Courier Servi...

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 29-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-09-2022

Haryana

Swadeshi Textile Agencies V/S Shree Maruti Courier Service Private Limited

Courier   Textile   Maruti  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No : 79 of 2015Date of Institution: 01.10.2015Date of Decision : 15.10.20151. Shree Maruti Courier Service Private Limited through its Manager, near Hotel Mid Town, Sanjay Chowk, G.T. Road, Panipa...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 01-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-10-2015

Uttar Pradesh

M/s Steel Arts V/S M/s Yogesh Courier Pvt Ltd

Courier  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Pankaj Chaturvedi

Respondant Advocate Arun Tandan

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/2372(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. M/s Yogesh Courier Pvt LtdA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Ste...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2004

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2016

Uttar Pradesh

M/s Steel Arts V/S Yogesh Courier Pvt Ltd

Courier  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S K VARMA

Respondant Advocate Arun Tandan

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/2373(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Yogesh Courier Pvt LtdA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Steel A...

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2004

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2016

Uttar Pradesh

M/s Steel Art V/S M/s Yogesh Courier

Courier  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S K VARMA

Respondant Advocate Arun Tandan

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2004/2374(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. M/s Yogesh CourierA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Steel ArtA....

Case Number: 2004

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2004

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2016

Pondicherry

First Flight Courier Ltd., rep. by its Manager V/S S.Gunasegaran, S/o.Late.S.Srinivasan

Courier   First Flight Courier  

Court Name: Pondicherry

Appelant Advocate M.Vaikunth

Respondant Advocate Thirumavalavan

...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 02-11-2015

Andhra Pradesh

1. DTDC Courier and Cargo Ltd V/S Sri N.Sahadeva Reddy

Courier   Dtdc Courier   Cargo   Dtdc  

Court Name: Cuddapah

Appelant Advocate Sri G.Trivikram Singh

Respondant Advocate Sri M.Sudhakar

Heading 1Heading 2Complaint Case No. CC/37/20151. Sri N.Sahadeva ReddyS/o N.Gangi Reddy, Proprietor, M/s Agencies aged 38 years, D.No.21/685-2,Hospital Road, 7 Roads, Kadapa City Kadapa,YSR DistrictAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. DTDC Courier and Cargo LtdRep b...

Case Number: 37

|

Date of Filing: 22-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 28-10-2015

Haryana

Tracon Courier Services through its Manager/Authorized Person V/S Daksh Enterprises

Courier  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. S.P.Tyagi

Respondant Advocate Sh. Rakesh Malik

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-10-2015

Jharkhand

Manager, Akash Ganga Courier Ltd. V/S Manoj Kumar

Courier  

Court Name: Dhanbad

Appelant Advocate G.P. Suman

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 31

|

Date of Filing: 08-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Courier in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Courier ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Courier under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.