Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8272 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
LABH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. & ANR. V/S KIRIT PRADYUMANBHAI SHAH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 12 Jan 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/370/2010(Against the Order dated 05/07/2006 in Appeal No. 67/2002 of the State Commission Gujarat) 1. KIRIT PRADYUMANBHAI SHAH14, New Alkapuri Society, Gulabi TekraAhm...
Case Number: 370
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 23-03-2010
M/s Sky Line Construction V/S Mrs. Farah Fathima
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2176
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2021
M/s Sky Line Construction V/S T. Asif Pasha and another
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2175
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2021
MOHAMMED ISMAIL KHAN V/S M/S. THREE STAR CONSTRUCTION CO.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MOHD. WASAY KHAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 4037 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 23/07/2009 in Appeal No. 897/2009 of the State Commission Maharastra) 1. M/S. THREE STAR CONSTRUCTION CO. ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MOHAMMED ISMAIL KHAN ........
Case Number: 4037
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2010
Case Number: 2010
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2018
M/S TIRUPATHI BALAJI CONSTRUCTION V/S VIJAYKUMAR THAKUR
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THANE. Room No.214, 2nd Floor, Collector Office, Court Naka, Thane(W)Complaint Case No. CC/09/405 1. VIJAYKUMAR THAKURMaharastra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. M/S TIRUPATHI BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONMaharastra ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: PRES...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S OM SAI CONSTRUCTION V/S SADANAND PUNIA MUDAD
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THANE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THANE DISTRICT THANE Room No.214, 2nd Floor, Collector office consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/312 SADANAND PUNIA MUDAD ...........Appellant(s)Vs.M/S OM SAI CONSTRUCTION ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Compl...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GANESH AGRAWAL V/S R.K.JAIN CONSTRUCTION BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR BHAWNANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 23 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 26/10/2009 in Appeal No. 294/2009 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh) 1. R.K.JAIN CONSTRUCTION BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS311-312. Third Floor, Lal Ganga Shopping Mall, G....
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2010
The General Manager The New India Assurance Co.ltd other-2 V/S M/S.Ramdas Construction Co.Divisional office No.IV
The New India Assurance Construction New India Assurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 356
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2000
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2016
Manohar Reddy, Chairman & M.D, M/s Happy Homes Construction Pvt Ltd V/S S.Gayathri W/o Sri V.N.Sitaram
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate V.Srinivasan
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMERS DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN,Ph:22352624 No:8, 7th floor, Sahakara bhavan, Cunningham road, Bangalore- 560052. Execution Application(EA) No. EP/08/185 S.Gayathri W/o Sri V.N.Sitaram ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Manohar Reddy,...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.