Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8231 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. & ANR. V/S YOGESH YADAV
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J.B. MUDGIL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 243 OF 20101. YOGESH YADAVProprietor- 'Mega Store' E-371, Nirman Vihar, Vikas MargDelhi-92...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. & ANR.15, UGF, Indra Prakash, 21, Barakhamba Ro...
Case Number: 243
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2011
NAVODAY CONSTRUCTION V/S RAJKUMARI VISHWAKARMA
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate ADV DINESH TRIPATI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2016
Mr. Vijaya R.T. Also Known as Vijaya Tata Ravipathi Proprietor M/s. Orange Construction & Infrastruc V/S Mrs. Archana Agarwal, W/o Mr. A.K. Agarwal Aged about 33 Years,
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri. Shakeel Ahmed
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/10/26491. Mrs. Archana Agarwal, W/o Mr. A.K. Agarwal Aged about 33 Years, Residing at Q.No. T-134/6, Air Force S...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Mr. Vijay R.T Also Known as Vijay Tt Ravipathi Proprietor M/s. Orange Construction & Infrastructure, V/S Mrs.Renu OJha W/o Mr. K.K. Ojha, Aged about 50 Years
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri. Shakeel Ahmed
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/10/26481. Mrs.Renu OJha W/o Mr. K.K. Ojha, Aged about 50 YearsResiding at No. 935/1, NP Area, Jalahalli East, Ba...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Laxmi Construction V/S Naresh M Purabia
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL DISPUTES FORUM,BANDRA3rd floor,New ADM BLDG. Near Chetna College,Bandra(E)-51.Complaint Case No. CC/10/111 1. Naresh M Purabia Mulund (W), Mumbai 80 ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Laxmi Construction 41, Chamria Niwas, Mahant Road, Vileparl...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PUROHIT CONSTRUCTION LIMITED AND OTHER TWO V/S AMIT CHANDRESH MAHETA AND OTHER ONE
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate V M MAKWANA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2020
SMT RIZWANA NASIR RIZAVI V/S M/S UNIQUE CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate UDAY WARUNJIKAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/34(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/11/2010 in Case No. 37/2010 of District Mumbai)1. M/S UNIQUE CONSTRUCTIONUNIQUE HEIGHT B WING GROUND FLOOR 48, M M CHHOTANI ROAD MAHIM WEST MU...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MOHD AKRAM ABDUL HAMID V/S M/S UNIQUE CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate UDAY WARUNJIKAR
Respondant Advocate U B Wavikar
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/34(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/11/2010 in Case No. 37/2010 of District Mumbai)1. M/S UNIQUE CONSTRUCTIONUNIQUE HEIGHT B WING GROUND FLOOR 48, M M CHHOTANI ROAD MAHIM WEST MU...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
NAMDHARI CONSTRUCTION V/S Smt.KRISHNA PATHYA
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate D.R.PANDEY
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
Seth Construction Co. ltd V/S Thakkar Pushkarbhai Jayantilal
Court Name: Bhavnagar
Appelant Advocate Ashish Pandiya
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.