company-name-logo

Construction

Latest Judgments

Total 8272 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.

Maharashtra

SHRI VILAS D SATHE V/S SANKALP CONSTRUCTION

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate RAHUL S GANDHI

Respondant Advocate Adv. Jayashree S. Kulkarni

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/08/1518(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/09/2008 in Case No. 168/2007 of District Pune)1. SANKALP CONSTRUCTIONTHROUGH ITS PARTNERS SHRI. PRABHAKAR PANDURANG BHOSALE, SANKALP NAGARI,...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

J H B Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Ravindra Kumar Garg

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mohan K. Nair & Co.

Respondant Advocate Shri. Suresh H. Sharma

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/02/601. Mr. Ravindra Kumar GargResiding at E - 201, Lav-Kush Appt., Sindhi Society, Chembur, Mumbai 400 071...........Complainant(s)Versus1. J H B Construction Company Pvt. L...

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2002

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

J. H. B. Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Micky R. Mahbubani through father Mr. R. Mahbubani

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Mohan K. Nair & Co.

Respondant Advocate Nelson Rajan

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/02/4381. Mr. Micky R. Mahbubani through father Mr. R. Mahbubani22, Gitanjali Building, Colaba, Mumbai 400 005.MumbaiMaharashtra2. Mr. Gobind G. Mahbubani22, Gitanjali Buildin...

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 27-12-2002

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

J H B Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Devendra Kapoor & Mrs. Neeta Kapoor

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mohan K. Nair & Co.

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/02/261. Mr. Devendra Kapoor & Mrs. Neeta KapoorThrough their constituent attorney Mr. Rajpal Sahani, Res. at B-4, Nidhi CHS, Sector 16A, Vashi, Navi Mumbai...........Complain...

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2002

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Nagpur

SUSHMA DILIP ANDHARE V/S MANGALMURTY CONSTRUCTION

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate ADV. GHATE

Respondant Advocate ADV KULKARANI

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 17-11-2017

Kerala

PSN Construction Equipments Pvt. Ltd, V/S Biju Jacob

Construction  

Court Name: Idukki

Appelant Advocate Adv.Shiji Joseph

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/1231. Biju JacobValayil(H),Manakkadu,ThodupuzhaIdukkiKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSN Construction Equipments Pvt. Ltd,4/126A,N.H.47,Edappalli Byepass,CochinErnakulamKerala2. Telco Construction Equipments Company Ltd,Reg.)/06,Jubili building,45...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 24-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

RAGHUNATH CHAND RAJPOOT V/S M/S KARTIK CONSTRUCTION

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 11-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2017

NCDRC

AJAY HEMANT GHOSARE & ANR. V/S SURABHI CONSTRUCTION

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 137 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 21/04/2010 in Appeal No. 1452/2008 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SURABHI CONSTRUCTION115/116, Bharat Bhavan, 1360, Shukrawar PethPune - 411002Maharashtra.......

Case Number: 137

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 28-07-2011

NCDRC

JAYSHEEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ORS. V/S KUNDIK GANPAT MOKAL

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MR. SANTOSH PAUL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 28/09/2006 in Complaint No. 319/1997 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. KUNDIK GANPAT MOKALFLAT NO 25, 4TH FLOOR, DAFFODIL COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD GODREJ SKY GARDEN, ...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2007

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2011

NCDRC

MS.VICHUS CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. & ANR. V/S MR.MATHEW VARGHESE & ORS.

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate N/A

Respondant Advocate N/A

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 56 OF 20031. MR.MATHEW VARGHESE & ORS.R/O 42 FRANKLIN ST ARLINGTON, M.A.02474 USA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MS.VICHUS CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD. & ANR.MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S.VICHUS CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD.,...

Case Number: 56

|

Date of Filing: 10-02-2003

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2011

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.