Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8272 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
M/S. CONWOOD CONSTRUCTION V/S RAMBACHAN JAISWAL, SHEELA JAOSWAL
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate WARUNJIKAR
Respondant Advocate WAVIKAR
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/09/2421. RAMBACHAN JAISWAL, SHEELA JAOSWALSHIV SHAKTI CHAWL, CHAITANYA NAGAR, IIT MARKET, HAREKRISHNA ROAD, POWAI, MUMBAI-67....
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Frontier Construction Company V/S Mrs. Mohinder Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Deepak Arora, Adv. for the complainant
Respondant Advocate Sh.Aalok Jagga,Adv.for OPs 1 &2. Name of OP 3 deleted vide order dt. 1.5.2001
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019CONSUMER CASE NO. 39 of 2011 1. Mrs. Mohinder GuptaW/o Sh. Darshan Gupta, Advocate, Haryana, High Court, Chandigarh, R/o Koti No. 1504, Sector 43-...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Oberoi Construction Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mrs. Shaila S. Pathak
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. 2008/7071. Mrs. Shaila S. Pathak A-404, Gokul Regency-I, Thakur Complex, kandivali-East, Mumbai-101 ...........Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 2008
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SANKALP CONSTRUCTION V/S RAJENDRA MHASKE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D. SANT
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/08/81(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/06/301 of District Pune)1. RAJENDRA MHASKEMaharastra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SANKALP CONSTRUCTIONMaharastra..............
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Riddhi Siddhi Construction V/S Suresh Purushottamdas Katta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV N B KALANTRI
Respondant Advocate Adv tiwari
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/08/367(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/02/2008 in Case No. CC/46/2007 of District )1. Suresh Purushottamdas KattaPra...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Gruhalaxmi Construction and Land Developers Through B.K. Burewar, V/S Shri Lokesh Ramesh Satpute
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate A.S.Bhendarkar
Respondant Advocate
CC/11/1District Consumer Forum, NagpurExecution Application No. EA/11/96 1. Shri Lokesh Ramesh SatputeWalker Road, MahalNagpurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Gruhalaxmi Construction and Land Developers Through B.K. Burewar, Gruhalaxmi Tower, Near Police Chowki, Dosar...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
S.L. BAMHORE V/S RAKHI CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1540 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 15/01/2010 in Appeal No. 464/2007 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAKHI CONSTRUCTIONThrough Satish Sharma, (Proprietor), N-2/116, Zone-2, Maharana Pratap ...
Case Number: 1540
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2011
S.K. VERMA V/S RAKHI CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1539 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 15/01/2010 in Appeal No. 465/2007 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAKHI CONSTRUCTIONThrough Satish Sharma, (Proprietor), N-2/116, Zone-2, Maharana Pratap ...
Case Number: 1539
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2011
Shidhi Vinayak Construction V/S Deepak vithal Shinde.
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate S.J.Patil
Respondant Advocate
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurExecution Application No. EA/11/95 1. Deepak vithal Shinde. Near Kirana Trores bamane Building.Ambedkar Society.Jaysingpur.Tal - Shirol.Kolhapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Shidhi Vinayak Construction215/2,Gall no 8,Jaysingpur.K...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
UMASHANKAR V/S VIDARBHA HOUSING CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ASSOCIATION
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINOD KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. SAMEER ADKAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3670 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 05/03/2009 in Appeal No. 1718/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. VIDARBHA HOUSING CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ASSOCIATIONThrough Its Chairman Sanjay Govindprasad P...
Case Number: 3670
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 07-10-2011
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.