Construction
Latest Judgments
Total 8272 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.
M/S CHANKYA CONSTRUCTION V/S SHRI SHRINIVAS P WATHARE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MANJIRI PARASNIS
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. RBT/A/11/826InFirst Appeal No. A/10/9221. SOU SWATI SHRINIVAS WATHARER/AT SNEH PLOT NO 38 PAWAR COLONY SHAHUPURI SATARA 415002SATARA MAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S CHANKYA CONSTRUCTION V/S SOU SWATI SHRINIVAS WATHARE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MANJIRI PARASNIS
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. RBT/A/11/826InFirst Appeal No. A/10/9221. SOU SWATI SHRINIVAS WATHARER/AT SNEH PLOT NO 38 PAWAR COLONY SHAHUPURI SATARA 415002SATARA MAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
ASHOK ANNAJI KHEDKAR V/S VINOD RAMRAO GAIKWAD, PROPRIETOR OF AKASH CONSTRUCTION CO.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR. M. R. KHAN
Respondant Advocate PARIJAT M. PANDE
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2017
Bank of Baroda, Through The Senior Branch Manager V/S M/s. Master Construction
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G. C. Singh
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/05/1371. M/s. Master Construction2nd floor, Plot No. 112, Vith Road, TPS III, Khar (West), Mumbai 400 052...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bank of Baroda, Through The Senior ...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Skyline construction & housing ltd V/S Sri Bharat Kona
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri M S Ashwin kumar & Smt Sowmya
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1246
|
Date of Filing: 07-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2015
SHREE ANAND CONSTRUCTION CO. THROUGH PROP. SHRI. RAJENDRA K. BORA AND ORS. V/S SOU. NIRMALA S. BHATEWARA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/2331(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/09/2004 in Case No. PDF/131/2002 of District Pune)1. SOU. NIRMALA S. BHATEWARA1, PRINSTANT TOWN, KALYANI NAGAR, YERWADA, PUNE-411006...........
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SHREE ANAND CONSTRUCTION CO. THROUGH PROP. SHRI RAJENDRA K. BORA AND ORS. V/S SHRI. SHANTILAL B. BHATEWARA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/04/2330(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/09/2004 in Case No. PDF/132/2002 of District Pune)1. SHRI. SHANTILAL B. BHATEWARA1, PRINSTANT TOWN, KALYANI NAGAR, YERWADA, PUNE-411006........
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Sakar Construction V/S Sanjiwani Pingale
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate V.G.Kulkarni
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/09/5251. Sanjiwani PingaleRastapeth Pune11...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sakar ConstructionYerwada Pune 06............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt. Anjali Deshmukh PRESIDENT Shri. S. K. Kapase MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERश्रीमती. अंजली द�...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S.ISHWARI CONSTRUCTION V/S MRS PRAGATI ANANT BORLE
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate PRAKASH P. JAGTAP
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/151. MRS PRAGATI ANANT BORLEFLAT NO. 7, SAI DHAM C.H.S. LTD., PLOT NO. 276, P.M. ROAD, NEAR CRYSTAL CABLE NETWORK, VILE PA...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Moti Construction V/S Shikant Vanarase
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Prakash E. sindekar
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/3061. Shikant VanaraseKasba Peth Pune 11PuneMaha.2. Suvidha S. VanaraseKasba Peth PunePuneMaha.3. Gajanan S. VanaraseKasba Peth PunePuneMaha............Complainant(s)Versus1. Moti ConstructionSalisberry Park PunePuneMaha.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: S...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.