company-name-logo

Construction

Latest Judgments

Total 8272 Consumer Court Cases Against Construction.

Gujarat

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD V/S M/S SHASHIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

The New India Assurance   Construction   New India Assurance  

Court Name: Ahmedabad City

Appelant Advocate D N PATEL

Respondant Advocate M.J.PARIKH

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 12-09-2008

|

Date of Upload: 28-08-2020

Maharashtra

SEEMA CONSTRUCTION CO. V/S MR DILIPSINH GOHIL

Construction  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate NO

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/3871. MR DILIPSINH GOHIL302, SAI ASHISH-2, NEAR NENCEY COLONY, BORIVLI-EAST, MUMBAI-66............Complainant(s)Versus1. S...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 25-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

FARAH FATHIMA V/S SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION & HOUSING PVT. LTD.

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. INDUS LAW

Respondant Advocate MR. SRIKALLA G.K. & MS. MAMTA CHANDEL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3740 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 06/07/2010 in Appeal No. 1494/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION & HOUSING PVT. LTD.No. 11, Hayes RoadBangalore - 01Karnataka..............

Case Number: 3741

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-01-2012

NCDRC

T. ASIF PASHA & ANR. V/S SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION & HOUSING PVT. LTD.

Construction  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. INDUS LAW

Respondant Advocate MR. SRIKALAA G.K. & MS. MAMTA CHANDEL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3740 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 06/07/2010 in Appeal No. 1494/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION & HOUSING PVT. LTD.No. 11, Hayes RoadBangalore - 01Karnataka..............

Case Number: 3740

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-01-2012

Maharashtra

M/S. PARANJAPE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY V/S MR NUCHIKAKATH SOMNATHAN

Construction  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate THRU REPRESENTITIVE

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/11/1401. MR NUCHIKAKATH SOMNATHANSHANTHI NIVAS, POST-POOKODE, VIA- PATHAYAKUNNU, KANNOOR DISTRICT, KERALA-670691...........Co...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/S SANKALP CONSTRUCTION V/S SHRU JAYWANT RAMBHAU GAIKAWAD

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S S BHALERAO & CO

Respondant Advocate -

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/08/1527(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/09/2008 in Case No. 137/2007 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. SHRU JAYWANT RAMBHAU GAIKAWADKAMRAJ NAGAR YERAWADA PUNE 15PUNEMaharastra......

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SHRI JAIWANT R GAIKAWAD V/S SANCALP CONSTRUCTION

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate R S GANDHI

Respondant Advocate S.S. BHALERAO

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/08/1517(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/09/2008 in Case No. 137/2007 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. SANCALP CONSTRUCTIONSANKALP NAGARI S NO 82/2/2 DHANORI VISHRANTWADI RD., PU...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

M/S KRYPTON CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD V/S RAJESH KUMAR ATMAPRASAD PANDEY

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate E A SASI

Respondant Advocate MR. AKSHAY BOBDE

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/09/631. RAJESH KUMAR ATMAPRASAD PANDEY194/2132 SEC VI CGS COLONY ANTOP HILL MUMBAI 37Maharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S KRYPTON CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD312 COMMERCE ...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 31-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

SMT.REETA V/S M/S ALMAS CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDERS (P) LTD.

Construction  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2015

Maharashtra

Shri Siddhanath Construction Builders And Developer and Contractors V/S Vaibhav Madhukar Karajgar

Construction  

Court Name: Kolhapur

Appelant Advocate Sangita Tambe

Respondant Advocate Mahesh Jadhav

monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/11/314 1. Vaibhav Madhukar KarajgarTatyaso Mohite colony, Kolhapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Shri Siddhanath Construction Builders And Developer and Contractors Smt. Nilima Nandkishor Dubal More mane naga...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Construction in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Construction ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Construction under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.